A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

A comparison of a home parenteral nutrition service with the current European (ESPEN) guidelines on chronic intestinal failure in adults. | LitMetric

A comparison of a home parenteral nutrition service with the current European (ESPEN) guidelines on chronic intestinal failure in adults.

Clin Nutr ESPEN

School of Allied Health, Faculty of Education & Health Sciences, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland. Electronic address:

Published: August 2022

Background & Aims: Comprehensive evidenced based guidelines on appropriate and safe provision of home parenteral nutrition (HPN) have been developed by the European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism (ESPEN) in 2016 and 2020. These guidelines provide clinical standards of care against which the current practice of HPN services can be audited. The aim of this study was to audit a single center's current practice against 183 recommendations on supporting patients on HPN. The objective was to measure compliance and identify areas for quality improvement.

Methods: A retrospective audit of the HPN service received by patients from January 2019-May 2021 was conducted. The ESPEN guidelines were used as a benchmark to measure compliance of healthcare practice. Compliance was evaluated for the 13 subject areas included in the 2016 guideline and the 6 subject areas included in the 2020 guideline. Compliance was calculated as the percentage of criteria fully met for each subject area and an overall compliance rate with each guideline.

Results: Overall, compliance with the recommendations from 2016 was 80% and compliance with the recommendations from 2020 was 65%. Within the 2020 guideline there were 24 recommendations where noncompliance was found, 15 of these were due to the absence of a nutrition support team and dedicated intestinal failure unit.

Conclusion: This audit and evaluation of current practice has identified areas of good evidence-based healthcare practice providing HPN. However, the absence of funding of a nutrition support team to provide a service to patients on HPN was identified as a major barrier to compliance with ESPEN recommendations in this study.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clnesp.2022.04.029DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

current practice
12
parenteral nutrition
8
espen guidelines
8
intestinal failure
8
patients hpn
8
compliance
8
measure compliance
8
healthcare practice
8
subject areas
8
areas included
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!