A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Efficacy and safety of different surgical approaches for caesarean scar defect: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. | LitMetric
Browse Categories

Efficacy and safety of different surgical approaches for caesarean scar defect: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Shilei Xu Hong Zhu Yaqing Ning Jun Gao

Asian J Surg

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China; Nanchang Key Laboratory for Precision Medicine in Gynecologic Oncology, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China. Electronic address:

Published: November 2022

Download full-text PDF

 Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asjsur.2022.05.109DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

efficacy safety
4
safety surgical
4
surgical approaches
4
approaches caesarean
4
caesarean scar
4
scar defect
4
defect systematic
4
systematic review
4
review network
4
network meta-analysis
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!

Privacy Policy Site Map

© LitMetric 2025. All rights reserved.