Background: Traditional angiography only displays two-dimensional images of the coronary arteries during stent implantation. However, intravascular imaging can show the structure of the vascular wall, plaque characteristics. This article aims to evaluate the efficacy of intravascular imaging-guided drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation.

Method: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of intravascular imaging-guided, including patients with DES implantation guided by intravascular ultrasound or optical coherence tomography and traditional angiography. The databases of PubMed, EMBASE, web of science, and Cochrane Library were searched. The primary outcome was target lesion revascularization (TLR). The secondary outcomes included the target vessel revascularization (TVR), myocardial infarction (MI), stent thrombosis (ST), cardiac death, all-cause death, and the major adverse cardiac events (MACE) during the 6-24 months follow-up. The fixed-effects model was used to calculate the relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence interval of the outcome event. Meanwhile, the trial sequence analysis was employed to evaluate the results.

Result: This meta-analysis included fourteen randomized controlled trials with 7307 patients. Compared with angiography-guided, intravascular imaging-guided DES implantation can significantly reduce the risk of TLR (RR 0.63, 0.49-0.82, P = 0.0004), TVR (RR 0.66, 0.52-0.85, P = 0.001), cardiac death (RR 0.58; 0.38-0.89; P = 0.01), MACE (RR 0.67, 0.57-0.79; P < 0.00001) and ST (RR 0.43, 0.24-0.78; P = 0.005). While there was no significant difference regarding MI (RR 0.77, 0.57-1.05, P = 0.10) and all-cause death (RR 0.87, 0.58-1.30, P = 0.50).

Conclusions: Compared with angiography, intravascular imaging-guided DES implantation is associated with better clinical outcomes in patients with coronary artery disease, especially complex lesions (Registered by PROSPERO, CRD 42021289205).

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9308935PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12872-022-02772-wDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

intravascular imaging-guided
16
efficacy intravascular
8
imaging-guided drug-eluting
8
drug-eluting stent
8
stent implantation
8
systematic review
8
review meta-analysis
8
meta-analysis randomized
8
traditional angiography
8
randomized controlled
8

Similar Publications

Article Synopsis
  • The study evaluates various techniques for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) to determine which yields the best patient outcomes.
  • It analyzes data from 39 randomized trials involving over 29,000 patients, highlighting that intravascular imaging (like OCT and IVUS) and physiology-guided strategies (like FFR) significantly reduce cardiac death compared to traditional coronary angiography (CA).
  • Overall, the results suggest that OCT is the most effective guidance method, leading to lower rates of myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, and all-cause mortality compared to CA.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The role of Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) is still unclear in patients with STEMI undergoing PCI in the current second-generation DES era.

Aims: This study aimed to evaluate the trends and outcomes of IVUS-guided PCI in patients with STEMI.

Methods: We used the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database from 2016 to 2021.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Limited evidence exists regarding the long-term outcomes of true versus nontrue coronary bifurcation lesions (CBLs) treated with current-generation drug-eluting stents and intravascular imaging guidance. The Sapporo Cardiovascular Clinic (SCVC) registry was a prospective, single-center, all-comers registry enrolling 1,727 consecutive patients treated with bioresorbable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent under complete imaging guidance. From this registry, 440 patients with CBLs (25.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • Recent studies highlight the advantages of using intravascular imaging (IVI) for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) compared to traditional angiography, but the relevance of angiography-based physiological assessments during this procedure is not fully understood.
  • The FLAVOUR trial analyzed the impact of angiography-based physiological evaluations, specifically the quantitative flow ratio (μQFR), on treatment decisions for patients undergoing IVI-guided PCI.
  • Results indicated significant reclassification of treatment approaches based on μQFR, with the REFERENCE group experiencing a higher risk of major adverse cardiovascular events, while DEFER and PERFORM groups showed similar outcomes and quality of life after 2 years.*
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!