A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Non-Contact Atrial Fibrillation Detection From Face Videos by Learning Systolic Peaks. | LitMetric

Objective: We propose a non-contact approach for atrial fibrillation (AF) detection from face videos.

Methods: Face videos, electrocardiography (ECG), and contact photoplethysmography (PPG) from 100 healthy subjects and 100 AF patients are recorded. Data recordings from healthy subjects are all labeled as healthy. Two cardiologists evaluated ECG recordings of patients and labeled each recording as AF, sinus rhythm (SR), or atrial flutter (AFL). We use the 3D convolutional neural network for remote PPG monitoring and propose a novel loss function (Wasserstein distance) to use the timing of systolic peaks from contact PPG as the label for our model training. Then a set of heart rate variability (HRV) features are calculated from the inter-beat intervals, and a support vector machine (SVM) classifier is trained with HRV features.

Results: Our proposed method can accurately extract systolic peaks from face videos for AF detection. The proposed method is trained with subject-independent 10-fold cross-validation with 30 s video clips and tested on two tasks. 1) Classification of healthy versus AF: the accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity are 96.00%, 95.36%, and 96.12%. 2) Classification of SR versus AF: the accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity are 95.23%, 98.53%, and 91.12%. In addition, we also demonstrate the feasibility of non-contact AFL detection.

Conclusion: We achieve good performance of non-contact AF detection by learning systolic peaks.

Significance: non-contact AF detection can be used for self-screening of AF symptoms for suspectable populations at home or self-monitoring of AF recurrence after treatment for chronic patients.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/JBHI.2022.3193117DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

face videos
12
systolic peaks
12
atrial fibrillation
8
fibrillation detection
8
detection face
8
learning systolic
8
healthy subjects
8
proposed method
8
versus accuracy
8
accuracy sensitivity
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!