Importance: Preemptive kidney transplantation is the preferred treatment for end-stage kidney disease. However, deceased donor (DD) kidneys are limited, and the net benefit of allocating kidneys to a preemptively waitlisted patient rather than to a patient receiving dialysis is unclear.

Objective: To estimate the net benefit and costs of allocating kidneys to preemptively waitlisted patients vs those receiving dialysis.

Design, Setting, And Participants: This medical decision analytical model used data from the 2020 US Renal Data System to calculate patient survival among waitlisted patients who received a DD kidney transplant. Four patients were simulated, with similar characteristics: (1) a patient on the preemptive waiting list receiving a DD transplant, (2) a patient on the preemptive waiting list never receiving a transplant, (3) a waitlisted patient already receiving dialysis (dialysis vintage <1 year) receiving a transplant, and (4) a waitlisted patient already receiving dialysis (dialysis vintage <1 year) never receiving a transplant. Annual probability of initiating dialysis (for patients 1 and 2) and duration of dialysis (for patients 3 and 4) were varied in sensitivity analyses.

Exposures: Allocating a DD kidney to a patient on the preemptive waiting list vs the same kidney to a patient receiving dialysis for less than 1 year, with similar recipient characteristics.

Main Outcomes And Measures: Differences in projected quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and total costs.

Results: In a simulated patient with a mean start age of 50 years (range, 30-64 years), the patient receiving a preemptive DD transplantation experienced 10.58 (95% CI, 10.36-10.80) QALYs, and the patient on the preemptive waiting list never transplanted experienced 6.83 (95% CI, 6.67-6.99) QALYs. The patient receiving DD transplantation after less than 1 year of dialysis experienced 10.33 (95% CI, 10.21-10.55) QALYs, and the patient receiving dialysis who remained on the waiting list experienced 6.20 (95% CI, 6.04-6.36) QALYs; allocating a DD kidney to the preemptive patient added 3.75 (95% CI, 3.57-3.93) QALYs, whereas allocating the kidney to the patient already receiving dialysis added 4.13 (95% CI, 3.92-4.31) QALYs. While the estimated posttransplant survival was longest for the preemptive transplant recipient, preferentially allocating the kidney to the preemptive patient results in 0.39 (95% CI, 0.49-0.29) fewer QALYs. The net cost of preemptive transplantation was $54 100 (95% CI, $44 100-$64 100) more than transplantation to a waitlisted patient. If the rate of transitioning to dialysis was 20 (rather than 33) events per 100 patient waiting list-years, the net QALYs were -0.67 (95% CI, -0.78 to -0.56). If the patient was receiving dialysis for 3 to 4 years (vs <1 year) the net benefit was not significantly different; however, net costs were considerably higher for the preemptive option.

Conclusions And Relevance: In this decision analytic model study, although allocating DD kidneys to patients preemptively was the best option from a patient perspective, allocating DD kidneys to patients receiving dialysis was a better use of a scare resource from a societal perspective.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9308061PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.23325DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

patient preemptive
12
preemptive waiting
12
waiting list
12
patient receiving
12
receiving dialysis
12
deceased donor
8
kidney transplantation
8
patient
8
net benefit
8
allocating kidneys
8

Similar Publications

Introduction: What interventions effectively prevent postoperative stenosis following endoscopic resection (ER) of superficial esophageal cancer? This study aimed to identify effective interventions or combinations through a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Methods: Six databases were systematically searched for eligible studies up to 30 April 2023, on interventions to prevent esophageal stenosis post-ER. Odds ratios (ORs) evaluated stenosis rate (primary outcome) and complications (secondary outcome), while mean differences (MD) evaluated endoscopic balloon dilatation (EBD) sessions post-stenosis.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: RING finger protein 213 () p.R4810K is an established risk factor for moyamoya disease and intracranial artery stenosis in East Asian people. Recent evidence suggests its potential association with extracranial cardiovascular diseases, including pulmonary hypertension.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Predicting risk of maternal critical care admission in Scotland: Development of a risk prediction model.

J Intensive Care Soc

January 2025

Department of Anaesthesia, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.

Background: Identifying women at highest or lowest risk of perinatal intensive care unit (ICU) admission may enable clinicians to risk stratify women antenatally so that enhanced care or elective admission to ICU may be considered or excluded in birthing plans. We aimed to develop a statistical model to predict the risk of maternal ICU admission.

Methods: We studied 762,918 pregnancies between 2005 and 2018.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The treatment of glioblastomas (GBM) with radiation therapy is extremely challenging due to their invasive nature and high recurrence rate within normal brain tissue.

Purpose: In this work, we present a new metric called the tumour spread (TS) map, which utilizes diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) to predict the probable direction of tumour cells spread along fiber tracts. We hypothesized that the TS map could serve as a predictive tool for identifying patterns of likely recurrence in patients with GBM and, therefore, be used to modify the delivery of radiation treatment to pre-emptively target regions at high risk of tumour spread.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Aim: Branch atheromatous disease (BAD), characterized by the occlusion of perforating branches near the orifice of a parent artery, often develops early neurological deterioration because the mechanisms underlying BAD remain unclear. Abnormal wall shear stress (WSS) is strongly associated with endothelial dysfunction and plaque growth or rupture. Therefore, we hypothesized that computational fluid dynamics (CFD) modeling could detect differences in WSS between BAD and small-vessel occlusion (SVO), both of which result from perforating artery occlusion/stenosis.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!