Purpose: To assess the accuracy of different corneal powers for intraocular (IOL) power calculation in combined Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) and cataract surgery and investigate whether preoperative parameters correlate to the prediction error (PE).
Methods: This prospective case series involved patients with Fuchs endothelial dystrophy receiving combined DMEK and cataract surgery. Preoperatively, patients underwent optical biometry and anterior segment OCT (AS-OCT). AS-OCT measurements were repeated 6 months postoperatively, when final refraction was assessed. The PE was calculated using the preoperative average keratometry (K) measured by the optical biometer and User Group for Laser Interference Biometry (ULIB) constants. It was also calculated, after constant optimization, using the preoperative K from both devices and the total corneal power (TCP) measured by AS-OCT, as well as the postoperative K and TCP measured by AS-OCT.
Results: ULIB constants resulted in the highest hyperopic PE ( < .0001). Constant optimization improved the results, because the PE was zeroed out and the absolute PEs decreased. No significant difference was found among the Barrett Universal II, Emmetropia Verifying Optical 2.0, Haigis, Hoffer Q, Holladay 1, Kane, and SRK/T formulas. Further improvement was achieved with the postoperative K and TCP, although the accuracy remained moderate. The PE based on preoperative corneal measurements was correlated to the amount of corneal flattening; the latter could be predicted by multiple linear regression accounting for anterior and posterior corneal radii ( = .0002) and was correlated to the preoperative anterior/posterior ratio.
Conclusions: Constant optimization is beneficial for combined DMEK and phacoemulsification. Predicting postoperative corneal flattening may improve the results of IOL power accuracy. .
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20220601-02 | DOI Listing |
Clin Ophthalmol
December 2024
Alcon Vision LLC, Fort Worth, TX, USA.
Purpose: To compare the refractive prediction accuracy of the Optiwave Refractive Analysis (ORA) SYSTEM with the Barrett True-K (BTK) formula in calculating intraocular lens (IOL) power in eyes that underwent cataract surgery after previous myopic photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) or laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK).
Methods: This retrospective study evaluated patients aged ≥22 years with prior myopic PRK or LASIK who underwent unilateral or bilateral cataract removal and monofocal IOL implantation using the ORA SYSTEM at 177 sites in the United States. Two datasets were analyzed: All Eyes (ie, all eligible eyes) and First Surgery Eyes (ie, each patient's first implanted eye).
Cesk Slov Oftalmol
December 2024
Objective: The aim of this study is to compare the results of preoperative biometric data measured with optical biometers of different generations in patients with cataract. Lenstar optical biometry is based on the principle of optical low-coherence reflectometry (OLCR), and Anterion on swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT).
Material And Methods: A total of 200 eyes (103 patients) were included in a prospective study at the Faculty Hospital in Trenčín the period from June 2023 to January 2024.
BMC Ophthalmol
December 2024
Department of Ophthalmology, Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, Korea.
Background: The purpose of the study was to evaluate the relationship between prediction errors (PEs) and ocular biometric variables in cataract surgery using nine intraocular lens (IOL) formulas with an explainable machine learning model.
Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of consecutive patients who underwent standard cataract surgery with a Tecnis 1-piece IOL (ZCB00) at a single center. We calculated predicted refraction using the following IOL formulas: Barrett Universal II (BUII), Cooke K6, EVO V2.
Ophthalmology
December 2024
Department of Ophthalmology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Neurosciences, Minneapolis, University of Minnesota, MN;. Electronic address:
Clin Ophthalmol
December 2024
Department of Refractive Surgery, Eye Clinic Sistina Oftalmologija, Skopje, 1000 Republic of North Macedonia.
Purpose: To explore the significance of changes in anterior chamber depth (ΔACD) and astigmatism between 4 and 8 weeks following uneventful phacoemulsification.
Patients And Methods: Anterior chamber depth (ACD, mm), autorefractometry and subjective refraction were monitored in pseudophakic eyes implanted with non-toric IOLs (group 1, SA60AT, n=36; group 2, SN60WF, n=34; group 3, ICBOO, n=16) and phakic control group (n=30, group 4a, for ACD and autorefractometry) over four weeks. Changes in subjective refractions were compared with repeatability in normal phakic eyes (n=30, group 4b).
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!