Polyglycerol and Poly(ethylene glycol) exhibit different effects on pharmacokinetics and antibody generation when grafted to nanoparticle surfaces.

Poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) is widely employed for passivating nanoparticle (NP) surfaces to prolong blood circulation and enhance localization of NPs to target tissue. However, the immune response of PEGylated NPs-including anti-PEG antibody generation, accelerated blood clearance (ABC), and loss of delivery efficacy-is of some concern, especially for treatments that require repeat administrations. Although polyglycerol (PG), which has the same ethylene oxide backbone as PEG, has received attention as an alternative to PEG for NP coatings, the pharmacokinetic and immunogenic impact of PG has not been studied systematically. Here, linear PG, hyperbranched PG (hPG), and PEG-coated polylactide (PLA) NPs with varying surface densities were studied in parallel to determine the pharmacokinetics and immunogenicity of PG and hPG grafting, in comparison with PEG. We found that linear PG imparted the NPs a stealth property comparable to PEG, while hPG-grafted NPs needed a higher surface density to achieve the same pharmacokinetic impact. While linear PG-grafted NPs induced anti-PEG antibody production in mice, they exhibited minimal accelerated blood clearance (ABC) effects due to the poor interaction with anti-PEG immunoglobulin M (IgM). Further, we observed no anti-polymer IgM responses or ABC effects for hPG-grafted NPs.