Objective: Adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) have been linked to risky health behaviors, as well as the development of chronic health conditions such as both type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus. A connection between ACEs and diabetes self-management has not yet been established. The current study aims to investigate the relationships among ACEs, delay discounting, impulsivity, and diabetes self-management.

Method: A total of 227 adults aged 18 to 77 with type 1 diabetes, type 2 diabetes, and prediabetes were recruited to complete an online survey via Amazon's mechanical Turk. Participants completed validated measures of diabetes self-care, delay discounting, and impulsivity, as well as questions regarding diabetes history and financial strain.

Results: In the overall sample and controlling for financial strain, increased number of ACEs was significantly associated with poorer diabetes management (r = -.15, p < .05). Higher delay discounting was associated with fewer ACEs (r = -.31, p < .05) and better diabetes care (r = .42, p < .01), as well as increased number of diabetes-related complications (r = .33, p < .01), controlling for financial strain. Participants who use insulin to manage their diabetes had significantly better diabetes self-care scores (t(225) = 8.19, p < .01), higher levels of delay discounting (t(101) = 3.15, p < .01), and fewer reported ACEs (t(224) = -2.19, p < .05).

Conclusions: ACEs are associated with poorer diabetes self-management later in life. This may be an important consideration for clinicians treating patients with diabetes and prediabetes. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9635444PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/hea0001209DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

delay discounting
20
diabetes
14
discounting impulsivity
12
diabetes self-management
12
type diabetes
12
adverse childhood
8
childhood experiences
8
impulsivity diabetes
8
diabetes prediabetes
8
diabetes self-care
8

Similar Publications

Under rapid-acquisition, concurrent-chains choice procedures, psychomotor stimulants typically decrease the sensitivity of responding to changes in separate dimensions of reinforcement. Across two experiments, pigeons chose between outcomes that differed in terms of reinforcement delay and magnitude (the dimensions involved in delay discounting or "impulsive" choice; Experiment 1) or reinforcement probability and magnitude (the dimensions involved in probability discounting or "risky" choice; Experiment 2). Outcomes associated with each terminal link were varied independently and pseudorandomly across sessions such that in dominated sessions one terminal link was favorable in terms of both dimensions (sooner, larger in Experiment 1 and more likely, larger in Experiment 2) and in trade-off sessions each terminal link was favorable in terms of a different dimension.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Health data typically include patient-generated data and clinical medical data. Different types of data contribute to disease prevention, precision medicine, and the overall improvement of health care. With the introduction of regulations such as the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA), individuals play a key role in the sharing and application of personal health data.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Delay discounting (DD) describes the tendency of individuals to devalue the worth of a reward as a function of the delay in receiving it. DD is impaired in many clinical conditions and changes across development. Many existing automated DD tasks are built on copyrighted software and primarily designed for English speakers, which hinders content editing and accessibility.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Delay discounting predicts COVID-19 vaccine booster willingness.

Cogn Res Princ Implic

January 2025

Department of Psychology and Centre for Integrative and Applied Neuroscience, York University, 4700 Keele St., Toronto, ON, M3J 1P3, Canada.

Developing ways to predict and encourage vaccine booster uptake are necessary for durable immunity responses. In a multi-nation sample, recruited in June-August 2021, we assessed delay discounting (one's tendency to choose smaller immediate rewards over larger future rewards), COVID-19 vaccination status, demographics, and distress level. Participants who reported being vaccinated were invited back one year later (n = 2547) to report their willingness to receive a booster dose, along with reasons for their decision.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Nearly 20% of US cancer survivors develop cardiovascular disease (CVD) from cardiotoxic cancer treatments. Patients and providers may consider alternative treatments to lower cardiotoxicity risk, but these may be less effective at preventing relapse/recurrence, presenting a difficult tradeoff.

Aims: This study explored survivors' cancer treatment decision-making when weighing this tradeoff.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!