A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Comparison of the relative efficacy of different biologics in different body areas in patients with moderate to severe psoriasis receiving biologics and tofacitinib in phase 3 randomized controlled trials: a 15-year single-center experience. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • * A study analyzed 177 Asian patients' responses to various biologics and tofacitinib over several trials, revealing that secukinumab, ixekizumab, guselkumab, and risankizumab were more effective than other treatments, especially in specific body areas.
  • * Although treatment responses varied by location, both the head and neck and lower extremities showed slower overall improvement, indicating the need for more studies with larger groups to better assess treatment efficacy across different body regions.

Article Abstract

Background: Focal resistant plaques are still common despite the use of biologics for psoriasis. significant impact on quality of life.

Research Design And Methods: We compared the relative efficacy of different biologics and tofacitinib in different body areas in 177 Asian patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis in 10 biologics or tofacitinib trials conducted between 2004 and 2019. Pooled data were analyzed at weeks 12-16 and weeks 44-52, respectively, for total and four regional PASI 75, 90, and 100 responses.

Results: The result showed that secukinumab, ixekizumab, guselkumab, and risankizumab had more favorable efficacy, followed by adalimumab, ustekinumab, and tofacitinib, while etanercept showed the least efficacy. The regional PASI response peaked early in the head area with subsequent decline, while the lower extremities improved slowly. At week 52, the head and neck and lower extremities were less likely to achieve PASI responses compared to the trunk and upper extremities.

Conclusions: The treatment responses of different body regions of biologics and tofacitinib were in line with the overall response. However, the head region responds fast, but total clearance at 52 weeks was similarly lower as the leg region. More subjects and prospective studies may be required to compare the efficacy of different biologics in different body regions.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17512433.2022.2103538DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

biologics tofacitinib
16
efficacy biologics
12
relative efficacy
8
biologics body
8
body areas
8
regional pasi
8
lower extremities
8
body regions
8
biologics
7
efficacy
5

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!