Comparison of Total Corneal Astigmatism between IOLMaster and Pentacam.

Biomed Res Int

Department of Ophthalmology, Peking University People's Hospital, Eye Diseases and Optometry Institute, Beijing Key Laboratory of Diagnosis and Therapy of Retinal and Choroid Diseases, College of Optometry, Peking University Health Science Center, 11 Xizhimen South Street, Xicheng District, Beijing 100044, China.

Published: July 2022

Purpose: To compare the total corneal astigmatism (TCA) measured by IOLMaster 700 and Pentacam and to investigate the consistency of corneal keratometry (CK) measured by IOLMaster and Pentacam.

Methods: Cataract patients were retrospectively enrolled in March and April, 2021. Retrospective analysis was performed on those patients with binocular and monocular CK measured by IOLMaster and Pentacam.

Results: A total of 102 patients (204 eyes) were included, 64 of whom were female (62.75%). The flat (K1) and steep (K2) CK of anterior corneal surface (ACS) and flat (TK1) and steep (TK2) of total cornea measured with IOLMaster 700 were 44.16 ± 1.60 D, 45.09 ± 1.68 D, 44.12 ± 1.62 D, and 45.14 ± 1.69 D, respectively. Those measured with Pentacam were 44.31 ± 1.57 D, 45.22 ± 1.65 D, 44.15 ± 1.67 D, and 45.19 ± 1.82 D, respectively. The astigmatism of ACS and TCA were -0.94 ± 0.63 D and -1.02 ± 0.69 D ( < 0.01) in the IOLMaster group and -0.90 ± 0.59 D and -1.05 ± 0.81 D in the Pentacam group, respectively ( < 0.01). TCA measurement results of IOLMaster and Pentacam were consistent (Pearson = 0.710, < 0.01), and there was no significant difference ( = 0.591).

Conclusions: Total corneal astigmatism measured by IOLMaster was consistent with that measured by Pentacam. The difference between the astigmatism of anterior corneal surface and total cornea was detected in the measurement of IOLMaster and Pentacam, respectively.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9286877PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/9236006DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

measured iolmaster
20
total corneal
12
corneal astigmatism
12
iolmaster pentacam
12
iolmaster
9
iolmaster 700
8
anterior corneal
8
corneal surface
8
total cornea
8
measured pentacam
8

Similar Publications

Purpose: To apply a new method, the Taylor Diagram, and a new concept, the centered root mean square error (cRMSE), in evaluating the performance of IOL formulas.

Methods: The preoperative biometrics were measured with the IOLMaster 700 (Carl Zeiss Meditec) and the postoperative spherical equivalent refraction (SER) was calculated in 888 anonymous patients. The Taylor Diagram was applied to visualize the centered root mean square error (cRMSE) and the correlation coefficient between the predictions and the observations (R).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: To evaluate the accuracy of toric intraocular lens (IOL) axis prediction between two preoperative measurement devices: the optical biometry (IOLMaster 500 or 700) and the dual Scheimpflug topography (Galilei G4).

Methods: Medical records of 64 eyes from 44 patients who underwent phacoemulsification and posterior chamber toric IOL (Zeiss AT TORBI 709M) implantation between July 2017 and January 2022 were reviewed. All patients underwent preoperative evaluation by optical biometry (IOLMaster 500 or IOLMaster 700) and Galilei G4.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: To investigate different measures for corneal astigmatism in the context of reconstructed corneal astigmatism (recCP) as required to correct the pseudophakic eye, and to derive prediction models to map measured corneal astigmatism to recCP.

Methods: Retrospective single centre study of 509 eyes of 509 cataract patients with monofocal (MX60P) IOL. Corneal power measured with the IOLMaster 700 keratometry (IOLMK), and Galilei G4 keratometry (GK), total corneal power (TCP2), and Alpin's integrated front (CorT) and total corneal power (CorTTP).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: This study aims to compare and evaluate the correlation and agreement among three distinct anterior segment analysis systems in measuring anterior chamber depth (ACD) in healthy myopic individuals.

Methods: Myopic patients who underwent preoperative assessments at our hospital's refractive surgery department from January 2021 to December 2023 were included in this investigation. ACD was measured using three anterior segment analysis systems: Pentacam, Sirius, and IOLMaster 700.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: This study evaluates the discrepancies between ACV measurements obtained from the Heidelberg Anterion and Zeiss IOLMaster 700 and investigates the significance of ACV and other ocular biometry parameters.

Patients And Methods: To investigate intraocular fluid circulation, a robust formula was developed for ACV measurement using the Zeiss IOLMaster 700. A pilot study was conducted to validate this formula, which relied on WTW, CCT, and ACD.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!