A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Next-generation sequencing and targeted quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction for detection of in the traditional Chinese medical formula Longdan Xiegan Wan. | LitMetric

Background: (Mu Tong) is commonly misused by (Guan Mutong) and (Chuan Mutong), which are nephrotoxic and carcinogenic. However, in the Pharmacopoeia of the People's Republic of China (2015 Edition), the method for determining remains undefined.

Methods: We used DNA barcode-based next-generation sequencing (NGS) combined with quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) to detect in Longdan Xiegan Wan (LDXGW) for the first time. Compared with chromatographic studies, NGS enables better evaluation of the ingredient components of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) preparations. The feasibility of qPCR using species-specific primers to determine the authenticity of species has been validated. In this study, the constituents of in LDXGW from three different manufacturers were scanned by NGS. The independently developed qPCR detection primers of , , and were specifically used to analyze the LDXGW mentioned above.

Results: The results showed that qPCR detected in all commercial samples. Meanwhile, NGS detected the counterfeit species (Tie-Xian Lian) in all samples. We found that qPCR shows a difference in detecting , but it was not able to identify the unknown additives and adulterants for the primer pairs of .

Conclusions: Hence, it is sensitive and rapid, qPCR is not suitable for detection alone. The NGS approaches offer important novel insights that complement the qPCR method. The combination of NGS and qPCR will be a powerful complement to traditional identification methods of TCM substances.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9279772PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-22-2415DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

next-generation sequencing
8
quantitative real-time
8
real-time polymerase
8
polymerase chain
8
chain reaction
8
traditional chinese
8
longdan xiegan
8
xiegan wan
8
qpcr
8
ngs
6

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!