Objectives: To examine E-aminocaproic acid effectiveness in reducing transfusion requirements in overall and less-invasive cardiac surgery, and to assess its safety.
Design: Retrospective cohort study.
Setting: Single-center tertiary academic medical center.
Participants: A total of 19,111 adult patients who underwent elective surgery requiring cardiopulmonary bypass from January 1, 2008, through December 31, 2016.
Interventions: None.
Measurements And Main Results: Propensity matching was used to create well-balanced groups and separately compare both overall cohort and less-invasive surgery with and without E-aminocaproic acid. Supplementary zero-inflated negative binomial regression analysis was used because outcome data were zero-inflated. Effectiveness was assessed by transfusion requirements, and safety by comparison of in-hospital outcomes. In the overall cohort, patients receiving E-aminocaproic acid received fewer red blood cells postoperatively and fewer intra- and postoperativel blood products. In a less-invasive cohort, there was no significant difference in red blood cell transfusion either intra- or postoperatively, but the E-aminocaproic group received fewer intra- and postoperative platelets, intraoperative cryoprecipitate, and postoperative plasma. There were no significant differences for in-hospital outcomes in both less-invasive and overall cohorts.
Conclusions: The reduction of postoperative red blood cell requirement observed when analyzing the overall cohort did not translate to less-invasive cardiac surgery in the authors' patient population; however, both overall and less-invasive cohorts had lower requirements for other blood components with E-aminocaproic acid. There was no association with major Society of thoracic surgeons (STS)-defined morbidity and mortality in both groups.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/j.jvca.2022.06.005 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!