Statement Of Problem: How implant alignment impacts stud attachment retention and wear-induced alterations, notably when the attachment exhibits metal-to-metal frictional interlocking, is unclear.
Purpose: The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the effect of the interimplant angulation on retention forces and wear changes before and after 2 years of simulated clinical use of implant overdentures retained by titanium stud overdenture attachments.
Material And Methods: The canine regions of 3 identical edentulous mandibular models were used to receive 2 dental implants analogs with TiTach attachments (Dental Evolutions, Inc) at interimplant angulations of 0, 30, and 60 degrees. Six identical overdentures were constructed over each model (n=6). A universal testing machine was used to determine overdenture retention forces at 0, after 1440, and after 2880 insertion and removal cycles to simulate the average insertion and removal cycles in 12 and 24 months. A stereomicroscope, a laser microscope, and a scanning electron microscope were used to evaluate the wear in the attachments. A linear regression model, ANOVA, and the Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to analyze the data (α=.05).
Results: All groups demonstrated reduced retention over the study duration (P<.001). The retention forces of the 0- and 30-degree groups were not significantly different after 2880 insertion and removal cycles, but both were significantly higher than those of the 60-degree group (P=.002). Within each group, the wear pattern of the matrix cap was more noticeable than that of the patrix abutment, with increased wear changes as interimplant angulation increased (P<.001).
Conclusions: TiTach attachments could retain overdentures on parallel and divergent implants with a 30-degree angle of interimplant angulation. However, at a 60-degree angle of interimplant angulation, considerable reduction in retention forces and increased wear changes were observed after 2 years of simulated clinical use.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.06.007 | DOI Listing |
Bone resorption following tooth loss might compromise retention, stability, and support of conventional removable prostheses, and for this reason, implant-supported overdentures are suggested as a viable alternative for completely edentulous patients. Bars, telescopic attachments, or stud attachments have been used to provide retention through a different mechanism of action based on specific design characteristics. The purpose of this report is to thoroughly describe the applied protocol for the fabrication of an implant overdenture supported by two bars incorporating stud attachments.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFClin Oral Implants Res
September 2024
Department of Prosthodontics and Biomaterials, Center for Implantology, Medical Faculty, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
Objectives: To evaluate the survival rates and marginal bone loss of narrow-diameter titanium-zirconium implants supporting complete maxillary and mandibular overdentures up to 3 years after loading.
Materials And Methods: Ten completely edentulous patients who were dissatisfied with their complete dentures were enrolled. Two narrow-diameter implants were placed in the canine region of the maxilla and mandible.
Saudi Dent J
February 2024
Professor, Dean's Delegate for Research and Finance, Department of Removable Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Saint Joseph University, Beirut, Lebanon.
Introduction: This in-vitro study aimed to evaluate the retentive force and dislodgment time of three stud attachment systems used for mandibular two-implant overdentures by simulating insertion/removal cycles.
Materials And Methods: From a simulation of a completely edentulous mandible with two parallel implants (Ø4.5 mm internal hex connection) (Zimmer Biomet, Warsaw, IN), 15 resin bases were fabricated and divided into three groups (n = 5 each): OT Equator (Rhein83, Bologna, IT), Locator (Zest Dental Solutions, Escondido, CA) and Locator R-Tx (Zest Dental Solutions, Escondido, CA).
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater
February 2024
Unité de Recherche Biomatériaux Innovants et Interfaces, Université Paris Cité, Montrouge, France. Electronic address:
Background: The stud-shaped attachment systems (AS) with different shape designs (ball, cylindrical, conical) and materials (metallic, plastic, or a combination of both) are commonly used to provide better retention and stability in implant-retained mandibular overdentures (IRMO).
Purpose: The purpose of the present study was to evaluate and compare the retention loss and the wear (patterns, location, material loss) of three resilient unsplinted AS: a well-established ball attachment system (BAS) and two more recent cylindrical attachment systems (CAS), Locator R-Tx® and Novaloc®.
Materials And Methods: The implants, their corresponding abutments, the color-coded or position-coded retention devices (RD), the matrix metal housing were incorporated within CAD/CAM resin blocks and cyclically loaded with 19.
J Dent
September 2023
Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Pelotas, Gonçalves Chaves Street 457 RS, Pelotas 96015-560, Brazil.
Objectives: This parallel cross-sectional study compared masticatory function and patient-centered outcomes among 3 removable treatment strategies for mandibular edentulism.
Methods: Thirty-six edentulous participants rehabilitated using 3 removable treatment strategies for mandibular edentulism were allocated to one of the three groups (n=12): CCD (control), 2-IMO, and 3-IMO. Narrow diameter implants were installed using single-stage surgery and conventionally loaded with stud abutments.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!