Tolerance of minority beliefs and practices is typically considered a critical ingredient for an equal and diverse society. Psychologically, people can use both intuitive and deliberative cognitive sources to make tolerance judgments. Following dual-process theories, this research uses survey experiments to manipulate intuitive versus deliberative thinking to examine whether deliberative thinking increases tolerance of minority practices. Across three studies using nationally representative samples of Dutch majority members ( = 1,811), we find that deliberative thinking increases tolerance, regardless of whether people deliberate over pragmatic or principled reasons for accepting contested minority practices and social changes. These findings are similar across a range of minority practices and robust across gender, age, educational level, and political orientation. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/xap0000429 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Understanding Cancer Treatment Decision Making Among Cancer Survivors: Weighing Cancer Recurrence Versus Cardiotoxicity.
Psychooncology
January 2025
Integrative Biological and Behavioral Sciences, Division of Extramural Scientific Programs, National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities, Rockville, Maryland, USA.
Background: Nearly 20% of US cancer survivors develop cardiovascular disease (CVD) from cardiotoxic cancer treatments. Patients and providers may consider alternative treatments to lower cardiotoxicity risk, but these may be less effective at preventing relapse/recurrence, presenting a difficult tradeoff.
Aims: This study explored survivors' cancer treatment decision-making when weighing this tradeoff.
Harnessing deliberative regulation to address inequities in accessing healthcare services in England.
Med Law Rev
January 2025
University of Bristol, University of Bristol Business School, Bristol, UK.
System-level decisions around the commissioning and provision of healthcare services in England have contributed to barriers in accessing the National Health Service. In this article, we ask how to better regulate resource allocation to ensure greater equity in access to healthcare services. First, we focus on the Health and Care Act 2022, which, drawing on principles of deliberative regulation to address health inequalities, initiates a shift away from previous regulatory approaches towards a collaborative decision-making model.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAssessing the scalability of health system interventions in Africa: protocol for a Delphi study.
Health Res Policy Syst
December 2024
Health Information System, World Health Organization (WHO) Regional Office for Africa, Brazzaville, Republic of Congo.
Background: There is widespread enthusiasm for scaling interventions to strengthen health systems. However, little is known about the scalability of such interventions in Africa. In this study, we seek to assess the scalability of interventions for improving the functionality of health systems in Africa, as a key to large-scale implementation strategy of interventions with potential for impact.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFRoad toward institutionalizing health technology assessment in the Emirate of Abu Dhabi: The role of evidence-informed deliberative processes.
Int J Technol Assess Health Care
December 2024
Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Objective: This paper reports on the process used to embark on one of the core strategies of Abu Dhabi's Department of Health, which was to develop a roadmap for HTA implementation and institutionalization, based on the aspirations and needs of local stakeholders and making use of the evidence-informed deliberative processes framework. The paper also highlights the main features of the road map that may be expected to address some of the current challenges.
Methods: A series of activities were undertaken that informed the subsequent development of the roadmap.
How can managed entry agreements contribute to coverage decisions in Latin America?
Int J Technol Assess Health Care
December 2024
Department of Public Health, School of Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Context: Healthcare stakeholders in Latin America, including payers, manufacturers, and patients, seek to expedite access to technologies. However, uncertainty sometimes surrounds their true benefits and budgetary implications. Managed entry agreements (MEAs) are proposed to address this uncertainty by redistributing risks among key actors.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFWant AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!