AI Article Synopsis

  • Partial laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) can vary in complexity based on the tumor and procedure, prompting a study to assess outcomes using a new classification system.
  • The study analyzed 87 patients who underwent partial LLR, categorizing them into low and intermediate difficulty based on the IWATE criteria and further by resection type (edge, bowl-shaped, dome-shaped).
  • Results showed that the intermediate group experienced more blood loss and longer surgery times, while bowl-shaped resections faced higher complication rates and longer hospital stays compared to edge and dome-shaped resections; tumor size and depth emerged as key risk factors.

Article Abstract

Background: Partial laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) is a procedure that can have varying levels of surgical difficulty depending on the tumor status and procedure. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the surgical outcomes of partial LLR using a new resection classification system.

Methods: From January 2009 to May 2021, 156 patients underwent LLR; of them, 87 patients who underwent pure partial LLR were included in this study. They were classified according to the IWATE criteria as the low (n = 56) and intermediate (n = 31) difficulty groups and reclassified according to the resection type as the edge (ER, n = 45), bowl-shaped (BSR, n = 27), and dome-shaped resection (DSR, n = 15) groups. The following surgical outcomes were comparatively analyzed among the groups: intraoperative blood loss, the operation time, and complication rates. Preoperative risk factors for intraoperative blood transfusion and complications were evaluated.

Results: In the IWATE criteria-based analysis, the intermediate-difficulty group had significantly higher intraoperative blood loss (p = 0.005), operation time (p = 0.005), and Clavien-Dindo (CD) grade-based complication rates (CD grade 2 or higher, p = 0.03) than the low-difficulty group. When analyzing the resection type, the CD grade-based complication rate (p = 0.013) and surgical site infection (SSI, p = 0.005) were significantly higher and the postoperative hospitalization was significantly longer (p = 0.028) in the bowl-shaped resection (BSR) group than in the edge- (ER) and dome-shaped resection (DSR) groups. The tumor size (p = 0.011) and IWATE criteria score (p = 0.006) were independent risk factors for intraoperative blood transfusion in the multivariate analysis. The tumor depth (p = 0.011) and BSR (p = 0.002) were independent risk factors for complications of CD grade 2 or higher in the multivariate analysis. BSR was an independent risk factor for SSI in the multivariate analysis (p = 0.017).

Conclusions: Resection type could predict the rate of postoperative complications, while the IWATE criteria could predict the intraoperative surgical difficulty.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-022-09372-xDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

resection type
16
intraoperative blood
16
iwate criteria
12
risk factors
12
independent risk
12
multivariate analysis
12
resection
10
postoperative complications
8
liver resection
8
surgical difficulty
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!