How to be a Good Reviewer for a Scientific Journal.

J Clin Exp Hepatol

UNSW Microbiome Research Centre, St George & Sutherland Clinical Campuses, School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW Sydney, Australia.

Published: April 2022

In academia, peer-review refers to a fundamental quality control process whereby external experts (reviewers) are invited to provide unbiased critique of a paper (or other submitted material) and advise on suitability for publication. The process must be robust and conducted with honor and integrity and to the highest professional standards. It is not only the responsibility of the authors but also the reviewers to assess the manuscript appropriately and help in improving the quality of the finished article. A good reviewer not only assists the editors and the journal but can also benefit the authors, the wider scientific community and the general readership. In this article, we discuss the salient features of the peer-review process and tips for undertaking peer-review on scientific papers in an effective and professional manner, including opportunities to develop reviewer skills.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9257857PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jceh.2022.04.006DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

good reviewer
8
reviewer scientific
4
scientific journal
4
journal academia
4
academia peer-review
4
peer-review refers
4
refers fundamental
4
fundamental quality
4
quality control
4
control process
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!