Effects of Plasma Exchange Combined with Immunoglobulin Therapy on Consciousness, Immune Function, and Prognosis in Patients with Myasthenia Gravis Crisis: A Prospective Randomized Test.

Background: Myasthenia gravis (MG) is an acquired autoimmune disease. The main clinical features of MG are skeletal muscle fatigue and pathological fatigue, which worsen at night or after fatigue, such as dyspnea, dysphagia, and systemic weakness. Plasma exchange (PE) is often used in patients with acute exacerbation of MG. Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) is a collection of immunoglobulins from thousands of donors. IVIG can replace a variety of immunosuppressants or PE. However, the effect of PE or IVIG on patients' consciousness, immune function, and prognosis is not clear.

Objective: A prospective randomized test of the effects of PE combined with immunoglobulin on consciousness, immune function, and prognosis in patients with myasthenia gravis crisis (MGC).

Methods: Sixty patients with MGC treated from February 2019 to April 2021 were enrolled in our hospital. The cases who received PE were set as the PE group, and those who received PE combined with immunoglobulin were set as the PE+immunoglobulin group. The efficacy, clinical score, state of consciousness, immune function, acetylcholine receptor antibody (AChR-Ab), lymphocyte (LYM), albumin (ALB) levels, and the incidence of adverse reactions were compared.

Results: The improvement rate was 100.005% in the treatment group and 83.33% in the PE group. After treatment, the clinical score of the PE+immunoglobulin group was lower than that of the PE group, and the clinical relative score of the PE+immunoglobulin group was higher than that of the PE group ( < 0.05). The number of conscious people in the PE+immunoglobulin group was more than that in the PE group ( < 0.05). Immunoglobulin A, immunoglobulin M, immunoglobulin G, and immunoglobulin G in the PE+immunoglobulin group were higher than those in the PE group ( < 0.05). The levels of AChR-Ab and ALB in the PE+immunoglobulin group were higher than those in the PE group, while the level of LYM in the PE+immunoglobulin group was lower than that in the PE group. The incidence of skin system, gastrointestinal system, nervous system, and systemic damage in the PE+immunoglobulin group was lower than that in the PE group ( < 0.05).

Conclusion: The treatment of MGC with PE combined with immunoglobulin can not only effectively enhance the consciousness and immune function of patients but also effectively promote the prognosis, and the safety of treatment can be guaranteed.