Background: The optimal approach to improving patient experience and analgesia after ambulatory orthopaedic surgery remains unclear.

Methods: This multicentre, randomised clinical trial compared single-injection nerve block analgesia with home delivery of continuous nerve block analgesia by remote-controlled electronic pump. The primary outcome was patient-reported satisfaction (Evaluation du Vecu de l'Anesthesie Generale [EVAN-G]; 0-100) assessed on postoperative Day 2. Secondary outcomes focused on pain, opioid consumption, quality of rehabilitation, activity tracking using a wearable electronic device, and 90-day quality of life.

Results: We randomly assigned 294 patients to continuous pump delivery or single injection. For subjects with normal level of pain catastrophising (Pain Catastrophizing Scale <30; n=211), median global EVAN-G was higher with the electronic pump compared with the single injection (78 [69-86] vs 72 [63-84]; P=0.03), as were pain satisfaction scores (P=0.01). For the maximum pain levels, the numerical rating scale score was 2.0 (1.0-5.0) in the electronic-pump group vs 5.0 (3.0-7.0) in the single-injection group on the first 2 days after surgery (P<0.0001). Total opioid consumption in morphine equivalent was higher with single injection (mean [standard deviation]): 70.5 [73.8] vs 31.9 [54.2] mg; P<0.01). The groups did not differ in early rehabilitation on Day 1 or quality of life on Day 45. Electronic activity tracking indicated higher activity in the electronic-pump group (P<0.01).

Conclusions: Self-reported patient satisfaction at home was better with continuous nerve block analgesia via electronic pump vs single injection, without impairing early rehabilitation. Single-injection analgesia was associated with higher pain levels and opioid consumption and lower satisfaction. Patient catastrophising negatively affected the experience of pain.

Clinical Trial Registration: NCT02720965.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2022.05.039DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

patient experience
8
ambulatory orthopaedic
8
orthopaedic surgery
8
nerve block
8
block analgesia
8
comparison continuous
4
continuous single-injection
4
single-injection regional
4
analgesia
4
regional analgesia
4

Similar Publications

Telephone follow-up on Medicare patient surveys remains critical.

Am J Manag Care

January 2025

RAND, 1776 Main St, Santa Monica, CA 90401. Email:

Objectives: Patient experience surveys are essential to measuring patient-centered care, a key component of health care quality. Low response rates in underserved groups may limit their representation in overall measure performance and hamper efforts to assess health equity. Telephone follow-up improves response rates in many health care settings, yet little recent work has examined this for surveys of Medicare enrollees, including those with Medicare Advantage.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The prognosis for patients with several types of cancer has substantially improved following the introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors, a novel type of immunotherapy. However, patients may experience symptoms both from the cancer itself and from the medication. A prototype of the eHealth tool Cancer Patients Better Life Experience (CAPABLE) was developed to facilitate symptom management, aimed at patients with melanoma and renal cell carcinoma treated with immunotherapy.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The aging global population and the rising prevalence of chronic disease and multimorbidity have strained health care systems, driving the need for expanded health care resources. Transitioning to home-based care (HBC) may offer a sustainable solution, supported by technological innovations such as Internet of Medical Things (IoMT) platforms. However, the full potential of IoMT platforms to streamline health care delivery is often limited by interoperability challenges that hinder communication and pose risks to patient safety.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: In this study, we aimed to evaluate the association between the Extension for Community Healthcare Outcomes-Palliative Care (ECHO-PC; ECHO Model-Based comprehensive educational and telementoring intervention) for health care professionals (HCPs) and change in patient-reported quality-of-life (QOL; Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General [FACT-G]) among patients with advanced cancer. We also examined the association between ECHO-PC and changes in symptom distress (Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale [ESAS]), patient experience and satisfaction, and caregiver distress scores.

Methods: ECHO-PC Clinic sessions were conducted twice a month for 1 year by an interdisciplinary team of PC clinicians at the MD Anderson Cancer Center, with participation of experts in PC in sub-Saharan Africa, using standardized curriculum on the basis of PC needs in the region.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are vital tools in cardiovascular disease (CVD) research and care, providing insights that complement traditional clinical outcomes like mortality and morbidity. PROMs capture patient experiences with CVD, such as quality of life, functional capacity, and emotional well-being, allowing clinicians to assess how interventions impact daily life. PROMs are integral to cardiovascular investigations as well as management, especially in chronic conditions and rehabilitation, where they inform on the impact of personalized care plans by tracking symptom progression and patient adherence.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!