AI Article Synopsis

  • The gingival configuration around dental implant abutments is crucial for preserving marginal bone and ensuring long-term implant success.
  • The study aimed to analyze how changes in the morphology and surface treatments of implant abutments affect the health and quality of the surrounding peri-implant biological space.
  • A clinical trial involving 10 patients assessed the effects of different types of abutments on peri-implant soft tissue, with samples analyzed through histological methods and statistical tests revealing significant differences in tissue quality.

Article Abstract

Statement Of The Problem: The gingival configuration around implant abutments is of paramount importance for preserving the underlying marginal bone, and hence for the long-term success of dental implants.

Objective: The objective was to study, clinically and histologically, the effects of the change in the morphology of abutments connected to the endosseous implant, and of their surface treatment. In particular, the objective was to ascertain the effect of changing the shape of the transepithelial pillar and the treatment of its surface on the dimensions, quality and health of the components of the peri-implant biological space, such as the dimensions of the epithelial and connective tissues of the biological space, the concentration of inflammatory cells and the density of collagen fibers.

Methods: A clinical trial of 10 patients with a totally edentulous maxilla, who had four implants (IPX4010_GALIMPLANT, Sarria, Spain) inserted in the area of the first and second molars on both sides with computer-guided implant surgery, was conducted with the final purpose of assessing the quality of the peri-implant soft tissue attachment around the transepithelial abutments which were employed (aesthetic machined (RM), aesthetic anodized (RA), slim machined (SM) and slim anodized (SA)). At 8 weeks and following the collection of the samples (removal of the implant-abutment assembly with its surrounding hard and soft tissue) and their processing for subsequent histological and histomorphometric analysis in order to study the dimensions, quality and health of the peri-implant soft tissue area, the variables previously mentioned were determined according to the aims of the study. By using appropriate diameter trephine in order to obtain a useful fringe of soft tissue around the transepithelial pillars, ANOVA and chi-square tests were performed.

Results: The SPSS statistical analysis ANOVA results revealed that the machined slim abutments have a better performance considering the variables analyzed with epithelial and connective attachment heights of 1.52 mm and 2.3 mm, respectively, and that connective density (density of collagen fibers) was high at 85.7% of the sample size affected by the design for the slim abutments and 92.9% of the high-density sample size affected by the surface treatment for the machined surface.

Conclusions: All variables studied, despite the small sample size, showed the superiority of the slim machined abutment among the four groups.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9267537PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15134422DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

soft tissue
16
surface treatment
12
biological space
12
sample size
12
health peri-implant
8
peri-implant biological
8
dimensions quality
8
quality health
8
epithelial connective
8
density collagen
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!