Background: Despite transforaminal epidural steroid injection (ESI) being the first choice in patient with recurrent herniated intervertebral disc (HIVD), efficacy of ESI in those patients are not well established. Herein, we evaluate the effectiveness and outcome predictors of fluoroscopic transforaminal ESI for recurrent HIVD.

Methods: Seventy-seven patients (48 male; mean age, 51.3 years) with recurrent lumbar HIVD were included and divided into three groups according to initial treatment: conservative treatment, transforaminal ESI, and immediate surgery. ESI effectiveness was evaluated by operation rates, injection numbers in 6 months, and pain reduction (visual analog scale (VAS) scores). Clinical and MRI variables were analyzed as possible outcome predictors. Each subject in the transforaminal ESI group was individually matched to two patients with initial HIVD (control group).

Results: In the transforaminal ESI group (n = 37), 20 patients (54.1%) did not undergo reoperation. The initial and follow-up VAS scores were significantly higher in the reoperation group (p = 0.014, p = 0.019, respectively). Patients with either paresthesia or motor weakness (12/19, 63.2%) had a significantly higher reoperation rate than patients with only pain (5/18, 27.8%; p = 0.031). Extruded disc ratios ≥2.0 were significantly higher in the reoperation group (10/17, 58.8%; p = 0.048). The reoperation rate in the transforaminal ESI group (17/37, 45.9%) was higher than the operation rate in the control group (6/73, 8.2%; p<0.001).

Conclusion: Transforaminal ESI was effective in reducing radicular pain in patients with recurrent HIVD. Approximately 54% of patients did not undergo reoperation. An extruded disc ratio ≥2.0 and paresthesia or motor weakness were poor outcome predictors.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9262237PMC
http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0271054PLOS

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

transforaminal esi
20
outcome predictors
12
esi group
12
higher reoperation
12
transforaminal epidural
8
epidural steroid
8
recurrent herniated
8
herniated intervertebral
8
intervertebral disc
8
effectiveness outcome
8

Similar Publications

Objective: To compare patient radiation exposure and procedure time for lumbar epidural steroid injections (ESIs) performed under CT-fluoroscopy (CTF) vs spiral CT-guidance.

Materials And Methods: A retrospective cohort study of 767 consecutive lumbar ESIs performed between 2015-2023 using CTF vs spiral CT-guidance was conducted. Patient characteristics (age, sex, weight), procedural characteristics (injection level, type of ESI, trainee participation), and outcomes (patient radiation exposure, procedure time, pain relief, complications) were compared.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Epidural steroid injection technique.

Tech Vasc Interv Radiol

September 2024

Quantum Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham Hospital and Quantum Radiology, Atlanta, GA. Electronic address:

An epidural steroid injection (ESI) is a minimally invasive, image guided procedure for the treatment of back pain. Pain originating in the lumbar spine is the most common referral for ESI but the entire spine may be targeted. ESI can provide temporary but meaningful relief for patients who may have failed conservative management with oral analgesics and physical therapy.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Perspective: Risks/adverse events for epidural spinal injections.

Surg Neurol Int

September 2024

Assistant Clinical Professor of Orthopedics, NYU Langone Hospital, Long Island, NY, USA, 1122 Franklin Avenue Suite 106, Garden City, NY, USA.

Article Synopsis
  • Cervical and lumbar epidural spinal injections are commonly used in the US for back pain despite not having FDA approval, yet studies show they offer little to no short-term or long-term benefits compared to placebos.* -
  • Adverse events (AE) are more frequent and severe with cervical injections, particularly transforaminal (C-TFESI), leading to issues like respiratory distress, paralysis, and infections, while lumbar injections have their own set of risks.* -
  • Overall, the effectiveness of these injections is questioned, as most research indicates they do not significantly improve patient outcomes compared to other treatments like saline or local anesthetics.*
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Previous studies have suggested variability in practice patterns for transforaminal epidural steroid injections (TFESIs) despite published safety guidance. The purpose of this study was to understand recent trends in periprocedural safety practices in TFESIs and how some aspects of interventional pain practice may have been influenced by the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and related supply chain shortages.

Methods: A 91-item survey was distributed to 111 program directors of Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education accredited Pain Management fellowships, 42 North American Spine Society and Interventional Spine and Musculoskeletal Medicine recognized fellowship directors, and 100 private practice interventional pain physicians to capture current practices in epidural steroid injections from March 2021 to March 2022.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose Of Review: To provide an evidence-informed review weighing the pros and cons of particulate vs. nonparticulate steroids for lumbar transforaminal epidural steroid injections (TFESI).

Recent Findings: The relative use of nonparticulate vs.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!