Purpose: Measurement of prolactin in clinical laboratories is an important component in the management of patients with pituitary adenoma. Prolactin measurement is known to be sensitive to the high-dose hook effect, in the presence of extremely high prolactin concentrations. This interference is referred to in most recent articles discussing prolactin assays and the management of prolactin-secreting pituitary adenomas. The objective of our study was to evaluate if the high-dose hook effect remains relevant in current practice, when using currently available assays.
Methods: Serum from a patient with a giant macroprolactinoma was assayed using all of the available prolactin assays in France in 2020, using native serum and after dilution. Technical inserts from assays were reviewed to assess the information on analytical principles, numbers of steps, and any reference to high dose hook effect.
Results: Fourteen assay kits were studied by 16 laboratories; all were two-site immunometric assays, mostly using one step (11/14). Results obtained after dilution varied from 17,900 µg/L to 86,900 µg/L depending on the assay used. One tested assay was sensitive to the high-dose hook effect leading to a falsely lower prolactin concentration when measuring native serum (150 µg/L compared to 17,900 µg/L after dilution).
Conclusion: The high-dose hook effect still exists in a very small minority of prolactin assays. The evolution of assay methods may lead to new assays that remain sensitive to this effect in the future. We therefore advise that the hook effect should still be mentioned in prolactin assay recommendations.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11102-022-01246-8 | DOI Listing |
J Ethnopharmacol
January 2025
National and Local Collaborative Engineering Center of Chinese Medicinal Resources Industrialization and Formulae Innovative Medicine, Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center of Chinese Medicinal Resources Industrialization, Jiangsu Key Laboratory for High Technology Research of TCM Formulae, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, 210023, China. Electronic address:
Ethnopharmacological Relevance: Tripterygii wilfordii Radix, (TW) as a toxic herbal medicine, is the root of Tripterygium wilfordii Hook. F. , which commonly used in China for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis and autoimmune diseases, but its severe toxicity, particularly hepatotoxicity, significantly impacts its clinical application.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFForensic Sci Int
November 2024
Forensic Science SA, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; College of Science and Engineering, Flinders University of South Australia, Bedford Park, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Operational forensic laboratories routinely perform immunological assays for detecting various body fluids. The ABAcard® p30 and HemaTrace® immunochromatographic tests from Abacus Diagnostics are used for detecting the p30 enzyme in human semen and human haemoglobin present in blood respectively. In early 2023, manufacturer modifications to the ABAcard® p30 and HemaTrace® tests resulted in a reduction in card size and volume of sample extract used in the recommended protocol.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAnn Lab Med
July 2024
ARUP Laboratories, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
BMC Immunol
September 2023
Laboratory of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Graduate School of Innovative Life Science, University of Toyama, 3190 Gofuku, Toyama-Shi, Toyama, 930-8555, Japan.
Background: Rapid and accurate diagnosis of individuals with SARS-CoV-2 infection is an effective way to prevent and control the spread of COVID-19. Although the detection of SARS-CoV-2 viral RNA by RT-qPCR is the gold standard for COVID-19 testing, the use of antigen-detecting rapid diagnostic tests (Ag-RDTs) is emerging as a complementary surveillance tool as Omicron case numbers skyrocket worldwide. However, the results from Ag-RDTs are less accurate in individuals with low viral loads.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Virol Methods
November 2023
Institute for Medical Microbiology and Virology, University Hospital and Medical Faculty, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Background: The Abbott SARS-CoV-2 IgG Quant II assay and the Roche Elecsys double antigen sandwich (DAgS) immunoassay measure SARS-CoV-2 receptor binding domain (RBD)-specific antibodies in serum samples in different ways. The IgG Quant II assay uses an antigen in combination with a secondary antibody and the DAgS assay uses two antigens. The aim of the study was to investigate whether the assays give comparable results with monoclonal antibodies.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!