A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Endovascular embolisation of external carotid artery system haemorrhage in radiated nasopharyngeal carcinoma. | LitMetric

Endovascular embolisation of external carotid artery system haemorrhage in radiated nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol

Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, National University Hospital, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Singapore, 119228, Singapore.

Published: December 2022

Purpose: To review the effectiveness and safety of embolisation in managing haemorrhage from the external carotid artery (ECA) system in radiated nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients.

Methods: Radiated NPC patients who presented with severe oronasal bleeding and underwent digital subtraction angiography that excluded blowouts from the internal carotid artery from 2011 to 2021 were reviewed. Those who subsequently underwent embolisation of the ECA system were analysed for technical success rate, post-embolisation re-bleeding rate and complications.

Results: Seventeen embolisations were performed in fifteen patients during the 10-year period. The technical success rate was 100%, however the early haemostatic rate (no re-bleed within 7 days of embolisation) was 70.6% (12/17) and the overall long-term haemostatic rate was 58.8% (10/17). The re-bleed rates of targeted and empiric embolisations were 33.3% (3/9) and 50.0% (4/8), respectively. The re-bleed rates with liquid agents, coils and particles were 0% (0/7), 33.3% (1/3) and 85.7% (6/7), respectively. Amongst the embolisations utilising liquid agents, 71.4% (5/7) were targeted, distal embolisations. All re-bleeds underwent surgical ligation or repeat embolisation; half of them further experienced recurrent bleeding. There were no significant complications with embolisation.

Conclusion: Although embolisation of the ECA system in NPC has a high technical success rate and is safe, re-bleeding appears to be common. Targeted, distal embolisation with liquid embolics appear to have good haemostatic effect. Clinicians should be aware that patients may need repeated procedures to secure haemostasis.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-022-07491-8DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

carotid artery
12
eca system
12
technical success
12
success rate
12
external carotid
8
radiated nasopharyngeal
8
nasopharyngeal carcinoma
8
embolisation eca
8
haemostatic rate
8
re-bleed rates
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!