Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Objective: According to the case study of a large German clinic for psychiatry and psychotherapy, the introduction of a clinical ethics consultation should be scientifically accompanied and the results integrated into the implementation.
Methods: Employee surveys at different measurement points before and after the introduction were used as the data basis. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistical methods as well as inferentially tested for significance.
Results: Even before implementation, the majority of employees considered clinical ethics consultation to be important. A comparison of the two surveys showed that the employees' own participation in an ethics consultation significantly influenced its evaluation in a positive direction.
Conclusion: The involvement and participation of employees in the implementation of an ethics consultation has a significant influence on the acceptance and evaluation of these processes.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1875-3501 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!