Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Statement Of Problem: New fabrication techniques have been developed for removable partial denture (RPD) frameworks although studies validating the clinical application of these techniques are scarce.
Purpose: The purpose of this clinical study was to compare the adaptation of RPD framework rests made with conventional casting or computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) with selective laser sintering (SLS) at the clinical evaluation and 1 year after the delivery of the prostheses.
Material And Methods: This triple-blinded pilot study included 18 participants presenting with maxillary and/or mandibular partial edentulism, of which only 7 returned for the second measurement 1 year after prosthesis delivery. Participants were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 groups depending on whether the RPD framework was made with SLS or conventional lost-wax casting. The adaptation of the RPD at the rest seat area was evaluated by injecting a silicone material on the abutment tooth before seating. The silicone specimens were then sectioned transversely and measured with a scanning electron microscope. The statistical analysis was performed with a linear mixed-effect model with the intention to treat and with a 3-factor repeated measures ANOVA (α=.05).
Results: At the metal framework evaluation (T), the prostheses made with SLS showed a mean ±standard deviation adaptation of 398 ±45 μm, while those made with conventional casting presented a mean ±standard deviation adaptation of 176 ±41 μm (P=.009). One year after the delivery of the prostheses (T), the adaptation of the frameworks made with conventional casting was still significantly better (88 ±6 μm versus 197 ±94 μm, P=.03).
Conclusions: Frameworks made with SLS showed worse clinical accuracy at the rest than frameworks produced with conventional casting.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.05.006 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!