A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Impact of corticosteroid use on the clinical response and prognosis in patients with cardiac sarcoidosis who underwent an upgrade to cardiac resynchronization therapy. | LitMetric

Background: Corticosteroids are widely used in patients with cardiac sarcoidosis (CS). In addition, upgrading to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is sometimes needed. This study aimed to investigate the impact of corticosteroid use on the clinical outcomes following CRT upgrades.

Methods: A total of 48 consecutive patients with non-ischemic cardiomyopathies who underwent CRT upgrades were retrospectively reviewed and divided into three groups: group 1 included CS patients taking corticosteroids before the CRT upgrade ( = 7), group 2, CS patients not taking corticosteroids before the CRT upgrade ( = 10), and group 3, non-CS patients ( = 31). The echocardiographic response, heart failure hospitalizations, and cardiovascular deaths were evaluated.

Results: The baseline characteristics during CRT upgrades exhibited no significant differences in the echocardiographic data between the three groups. After the CRT upgrade, responses regarding the ejection fraction (EF) and end-systolic volume (ESV) were significantly lower in CS patients than non-CS patients (ΔEF: group 1, 6.7% vs. group 2, 7.7% vs. group 3, 13.6%;  = .039, ΔESV: 3.0 ml vs. -12.7 ml vs. -37.2 ml;  = .008). The rate of an echocardiographic response was lowest in group 1 (29%). There were, however, no significant differences in the cumulative freedom from a composite outcome among the three groups ( = .19). No cardiovascular deaths occurred in group 1.

Conclusion: The echocardiographic response to an upgrade to CRT and the long-term prognosis in patients with CS should be carefully evaluated because of the complex etiologies and impact of immunosuppressive therapy.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9237305PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/joa3.12697DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

three groups
12
crt upgrade
12
echocardiographic response
12
patients
9
impact corticosteroid
8
corticosteroid clinical
8
prognosis patients
8
patients cardiac
8
cardiac sarcoidosis
8
cardiac resynchronization
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!