A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Prediction of Fluid Responsiveness by the Effect of the Lung Recruitment Maneuver on the Perfusion Index in Mechanically Ventilated Patients During Surgery. | LitMetric

Introduction: Excessive or inadequate fluid administration during perioperative period affects outcomes. Adjustment of volume expansion (VE) by performing fluid responsiveness (FR) test plays an important role in optimizing fluid infusion. Since changes in stroke volume (SV) during lung recruitment maneuver (LRM) can predict FR, and peripheral perfusion index (PI) is related to SV; therefore, we hypothesized that the changes in PI during LRM (ΔPI) could predict FR during perioperative period.

Methods: Patients who were scheduled for elective non-laparoscopic surgery under general anesthesia with a mechanical ventilator and who required VE (250 mL of crystalloid solution infusion over 10 min) were included. Before VE, LRM was performed by a continuous positive airway pressure of 30 cm HO for 30 sec; hemodynamic variables with their changes (PI, obtained by pulse oximetry; and ΔPI, calculated by using [(PI before LRM-PI after LRM)/PI before LRM]100) were obtained before and after LRM. After SV (measured by esophageal doppler) and PI had returned to the baseline values, VE was infused, and the values of these variables were recorded again, before and after VE. Fluid responders (Fluid-Res) were defined by an increase in SV ≥10% after VE. Receiver operating characteristic curves of the baseline values and ΔPI were constructed and reported as areas under the curve (AUC) with 95% confidence intervals, to predict FR.

Results: Of 32 mechanically ventilated adult patients included, 13 (41%) were in the Fluid-Res group. Before VE and LRM, there were no differences in the mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate, SV, and PI between patients in the Fluid-Res and fluid non-responders (Fluid-NonRes) groups. After LRM, SV, MAP, and, PI decreased in both groups, ΔPI was greater in the Fluid-Res group than in Fluid-NonRes group (55.2 ± 17.8% vs. 35.3 ± 17.3%, < 0.001, respectively). After VE, only SV and cardiac index increased in the Fluid-Res group. ΔPI had the highest AUC [0.81 (0.66-0.97)] to predict FR with a cut-off value of 40% (sensitivity 92.3%, specificity 73.7%).

Conclusions: ΔPI can be applied to predict FR in mechanical ventilated patients during the perioperative period.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9247540PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.881267DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

fluid-res group
12
fluid responsiveness
8
lung recruitment
8
recruitment maneuver
8
mechanically ventilated
8
ventilated patients
8
perioperative period
8
baseline values
8
lrm
6
Δpi
6

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!