Success in a soccer penalty can be the difference between winning and losing matches. The outcome is determined by a complex interaction between the shooter and goalkeeper, whose performances are constrained by biomechanical trade-offs. To overcome these performance constraints, each player has a range of available strategies. Shooters can kick at different speeds, affecting accuracy, while goalkeepers can move at various times (leave-times), affecting the time available to move and the probability they move in the correct direction. Previous models of penalty success ignore such trade-offs and how they interact to influence the outcome. Here, we present a model that accounts for shooting inaccuracy to predict the probability of success for all shooting strategies, defined as any combination of: shot speed, position where the shooter aims, shooter footedness, and kicking technique (side-foot or instep). To estimate the probability of success each shooting strategy is matched against all possible goalkeeper leave-times, considering the probability each leave-time is chosen. We test the model against an average goalkeeper and a goalkeeper who tends to move later. Against the average goalkeeper, aiming on the ground toward the centre of the goal is optimal; however, against a late moving goalkeeper, aiming on the ground to the extremities of the goal is effective, with the optimal target in the horizontal dimension dependent on shot speed, kick technique, and footedness. Coaches could use this model to identify their best penalty takers and each players' optimal shooting strategy against either the average goalkeeper or a specific goalkeeper.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2022.111208DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

average goalkeeper
12
soccer penalty
8
penalty success
8
biomechanical trade-offs
8
goalkeeper
8
probability success
8
success shooting
8
shot speed
8
shooting strategy
8
goalkeeper aiming
8

Similar Publications

This preliminary study examined the effects of playing walking football with and without a goalkeeper (GK) on physiological, physical, technical, and perceptual variables in older men. Twenty participants (67 ± 4.7 years) engaged in two five vs.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background/objectives: Studies focused on the soccer goalkeeper position in training and official matches are scarce. The present study aimed to analyze the external load during training sessions and official matches in semi-professional goalkeepers.

Methods: Data from goalkeepers (n = 6) from the youth ranks of a professional team belonging to the first Spanish soccer league have been used.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

From Strikers to Keepers: Somatotype of Football Players from Slovakia.

Sports (Basel)

October 2024

Department of Zoology and Anthropology, Faculty of Natural Sciences and Informatics, Constantine the Philosopher University, Nabrezie Mladeze 91, 949 01 Nitra, Slovakia.

Background/objectives: This study aims to analyze and compare the somatotypes of professional football players from Slovakia with a non-athletic population.

Methods: Comparative analysis of professional soccer players by their positions, goalkeepers (n = 4; 8%), defenders (n = 16; 32%), strikers (n = 15; 30%), and midfielders (n = 15; 30%), in average age 16.88 ± 1.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

This study investigates the evolution of passing networks (PN) at both team and player levels in the FIFA World Cups (WC) from 2010 to 2022. Analyzing 256 matches (7328 player observations) using a multiple-camera tracking system across four WCs, we considered six playing positions: goalkeeper ( = 521), central defender ( = 1192), fullback ( = 1223), midfielder ( = 2039), winger ( = 1320), and central forward ( = 1033). We used 17 network metrics and considered contextual variables such as team formation, and team ranking.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Small-sided games (SSGs) are frequent training drills in soccer. This study investigated whether type of game (ie, with/without goalkeepers) and wildcard ( without vs internal vs external wildcard) impact the physiological (heartrate [HR]) and locomotor (total distance [TD] covered) demands in regular and wildcard players and to evaluate between-player and within-player variability.

Hypothesis: Demands are influenced by wildcard and game type, with higher demand (distance covered at high intensities and sprint speed) in regular players and with higher variability in SSG with wildcard players.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!