Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
The seasonal and annual energy efficiency of mainstream anaerobic membrane bioreactor (AnMBR) was first assessed in an onsite pilot plant (15 m/d) and then estimated in a scaled-up plant (10,000 m/d) in temperate climates (15-25 °C). It was found that the annual net electricity demand was 0.100 and 0.090 kWh/m, and the annual net energy (electricity + heat) demand was -0.158 and -0.309 kWh/m under the dissolved methane recovery condition and the non-recovery condition, respectively, demonstrated that the application of mainstream AnMBR in temperate climates is electricity saving and energy positive. The energy efficiency of the AnMBR decreased with temperature drop due to the reduction of methane production, and the increase in biogas sparging to mitigate membrane fouling. Since approximately 26.7%-39.7% of input COD remained in sludge, attention should be paid to recovering this potential energy to improve the overall energy performance of the mainstream AnMBR plants in future.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2022.127542 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!