AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to investigate the use of biological response modifiers (BRM) during pregnancy, looking at its prevalence and how it impacts clinical outcomes in infants, vaccination rates, and adverse events post-immunization.
  • A total of 2,243 out of over 1.2 million pregnant individuals used BRM, with usage increasing significantly from 2006 to 2017; results indicated no substantial differences in clinical outcomes between infants exposed and not exposed to BRM.
  • The findings suggest that in utero exposure to BRM does not raise the risk of serious health issues or vaccine-related adverse events, allowing these infants to receive live-attenuated vaccines as scheduled.

Article Abstract

Objectives:: To estimate the prevalence of biological response modifiers (BRM) use during pregnancy and compare clinical outcomes in infants, live-attenuated immunization coverage and adverse events of special interest (AESI) following immunization.

Methods:: We conducted a retrospective cohort study among pregnant people between 2006 – 2017 and children born from these pregnancies within the Vaccine Safety Datalink. We estimated the proportion of women who used BRM during pregnancy overall and by year of pregnancy onset. We compared clinical outcomes, live-attenuated vaccination coverage, and AESI occurring in specific risk intervals following immunization in children exposed and unexposed in utero to BRM.

Results:: Of the 1,205,416 pregnant people, 2,243 used BRM (19/10,000), which increased from 8/10,000 in 2006 to 46/10,000 pregnant people in 2017. The most frequently dispensed or prescribed BRM were etanercept (35.9%), anakinra (23.2%), adalimumab (21.4%) and infliximab (19.9%). Except for pneumonia, clinical outcomes of interest were rare among exposed and unexposed children to BRM. Proportions of clinical outcomes were similar between both groups. A lower proportion of children exposed to BRM receive rotavirus vaccines by age 12 months compared with unexposed children (79.5% vs. 85.4%). AESI with measles-containing vaccines or rotavirus vaccines were rare and proportions of these were similar among exposed and unexposed children.

Conclusion:: In utero exposure to BRM was not associated with an increased risk of clinically significant infections or adverse events following live-attenuated vaccines. These data provide reassurance that children exposed in utero to BRM can receive live-attenuated vaccines on the same schedule as other children.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11271740PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1542/peds.2021-056021DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

children exposed
16
clinical outcomes
16
live-attenuated vaccines
12
pregnant people
12
exposed unexposed
12
children
8
response modifiers
8
brm
8
brm pregnancy
8
adverse events
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!