[The marginal vein-Still a rare entity: case series of 16 patients].

Chirurgie (Heidelb)

Gefäßchirurgie, Medizinische Fakultät, Universität Augsburg, Stenglinstr. 2, 86156, Augsburg, Deutschland.

Published: September 2022

AI Article Synopsis

  • The marginal vein (MV) is a congenital vascular malformation resulting from incomplete development of the embryonic venous system in the legs, leading to various complications and a lack of standardized treatment options.
  • A study at the University Hospital Augsburg from 2008 to 2020 examined 16 patients with MV, finding that most were diagnosed in their teenage years and many had chronic venous insufficiency (CVI) and leg length differences.
  • The findings suggest that prompt treatment, preferably through conventional surgical methods rather than minimally invasive techniques, may prevent complications like CVI progression and reduce the need for multiple follow-up procedures.

Article Abstract

Background: The marginal vein (MV) is a congenital, predominantly venous vascular malformation, which is based on a lack of regression of the embryonic venous system in the lower extremities and is associated with a variety of complications. So far, no uniform treatment regimens have been described in the literature.

Objective: What are the treatment strategies and outcomes in patients with a MV?

Material And Methods: In the period from 1 January 2008 to 31 December 2020, all patients treated at the University Hospital Augsburg with MV were retrospectively reviewed.

Results: The median age at the time of diagnosis was 14.8 years (3-42 years). Out of 16 patients 12 had a leg length difference, 75% of patients (12/16) already had chronic venous insufficiency (CVI) at the time of diagnosis of MV. Open surgical removal of MV was performed as first-line treatment in 31.3% (5/16) patients. The MV was primarily closed by endovenous laser therapy (EVLT) in 1/16 patients, 15/16 patients were treated with redo procedures and 2.6 ± 2.4 (mean±SD) redo procedures were performed per patient in follow-up. The mean follow-up was 8.1 years.

Discussion: In order to prevent/avoid progression of CVI and thrombosis prophylaxis, the MV should be closed/removed promptly after diagnosis. The use of conventional surgical techniques for the removal of MV seems to have an advantage over treatment with minimally invasive procedures in terms of the number of secondary interventions required.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9399208PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00104-022-01648-1DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

time diagnosis
8
redo procedures
8
[the marginal
4
marginal vein-still
4
vein-still rare
4
rare entity
4
entity case
4
case series
4
series patients]
4
patients] background
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!