AI Article Synopsis

  • This study aimed to assess awareness and obstacles related to colorectal cancer (CRC) screening among the population of Kazakhstan, highlighting the importance of knowledge about CRC.
  • Conducted from 2020 to 2021 with 486 respondents, the survey revealed significant gaps in understanding, such as 50% unaware that CRC can occur without symptoms and 73% recognizing the benefits of screening.
  • Main barriers to screening included fears of diagnosis and unfavorable results (over 60% of participants), along with a general lack of knowledge about CRC, indicating a need for better education and outreach.

Article Abstract

Background: One of the obstacles to participating in CRC screening is the lack of knowledge about the importance of CRC, its risk factors and the benefits that can be obtained through screening. The aim of this study was to evaluate the awareness and to identify the barriers to colorectal cancer screening among the population of the Republic of Kazakhstan.

Methods: This is a cross-sectional study based on questionnaire, which was conducted in different regions of Kazakhstan from 2020 to 2021. This study involved 486 respondents. The survey was conducted both personally and using a web questionnaire. The questionnaire was developed independently, taking into account international results and experience, and was validated.

Results: 486 participants were included in this study. Out of 486 who participated: 245 (50.04%) did not know whether CRC can occur without symptoms, 259 (53.3%) did not know that the disease is widespread, 232 (47.7%) believed that the disease is curable, 276 (56.8%) believed that CRC is a fatal disease. 357 (73.5%) participants responded that screening can provide timely and effective treatment of CRC. 57.4% of respondents did not agree that the CRC screening procedure is ineffective. However, they had obstacles to screening, such as: fear of getting CRC in the future 298 people (61.3%); and receiving unfavorable results during the examination of 291 people (59.9%). 317 people (65.2%) indicated that their ignorance of CRC was also an obstacle to screening.

Conclusion: The results of the study indicate a lack of knowledge about the perception of CRC, participants' perception of risk factors, signs and symptoms of CRC and screening methods. And the main obstacles to screening are: fear of getting unfavorable results during screening; fear of getting sick in the future; and lack of knowledge about CRC.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9587842PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.31557/APJCP.2022.23.6.2057DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

crc screening
12
lack knowledge
12
screening fear
12
crc
11
screening
10
colorectal cancer
8
cancer screening
8
screening population
8
population republic
8
knowledge crc
8

Similar Publications

Purpose: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second leading cause of cancer mortality in the USA and is highly preventable, with early screening vital for improving outcomes. This study aimed to evaluate adherence rates of multi-target stool DNA (mt-sDNA) testing, following updated guidelines recommending screening starting at age 45.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study used aggregated data from Exact Sciences Laboratories LLC, examining new users (first-time testers) aged 45-85 with commercial, Medicare, or Medicaid insurance who received mt-sDNA test kits (point-of-care) between January 1, 2023, and June 1, 2023.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Anti-colorectal cancer actions of Glycyrrhiza uralensis Fisch. and its underlying mechanism via HPLC integration and network pharmacological approaches.

Phytomedicine

January 2025

College of Pharmacy, Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, 830000, China; School of Biological and Food Engineering, Engineering Research Center for Development and High Value Utilization of Genuine Medicinal Materials in North Anhui Province, Suzhou University, Suzhou, Anhui, 234000, China; Department of Analytical Chemistry and Food Science, Faculty of Food Science and Technology, University of Vigo-Ourense Campus, Ourense E-32004, Spain. Electronic address:

Background: The therapeutic and prognostic outcomes for colorectal cancer (CRC) remain unsatisfactory. Among multiple reported bioactive functionalities of Glycyrrhiza uralensis Fisch. one vital recently reported activity is its therapeutic role against numerous cancers but limited information is available related to its underlying key mechanisms and therapeutically active ingredients, especially against CRC treatment.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

While biomarkers have been shown to enhance the prognosis of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) compared to conventional treatments, there is a pressing need to discover novel biomarkers that can assist in assessing the prognostic impact of immunotherapy and in formulating individualized treatment plans. The RUNX family, consisting of RUNX1, RUNX2, and RUNX3, has been recognized as crucial regulators in developmental processes, with dysregulation of these genes also being implicated in tumorigenesis and cancer progression. In our present study, we demonstrated a crucial regulatory role of RUNX in CD8T and CD103CD8T cell-mediated anti-tumor response within the tumor microenvironment (TME) of human CRC.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The pathogenesis of colorectal cancer (CRC) is influenced by various risk factors, and genetic alterations in progression of colon polyps. The expression patterns of microRNA-548 (miR-548) in colorectal tissues have been sufficiently characterized. The aim of this study is to clarify the role of miR-548aa in tumorigenesis, gene targeting, predictive value and its expression levels in tumoral versus adjacent marginal tissues in CRC patients.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Gender and sex differences in colorectal cancer screening, diagnosis and treatment.

Clin Transl Oncol

January 2025

Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital of Navarra, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Navarra, IdISNA, Navarra, Spain.

Males have a higher incidence and mortality rate from colorectal cancer (CRC) compared with females. This review examines the reasons for these differences, including risk factors, screening participation, interpretation of screening tests, presentation and tumour types, pathophysiology (particularly the impact of sex hormones on tumour-related gene expression, microsatellite instability, micro-RNA expression, and the tumour microenvironment), and the efficacy and toxicity of treatment. Sex differences in hormones and body composition are responsible for some of the sexual dimorphism in CRC incidence and outcomes, particularly the pathophysiology, CRC presentation, the pharmacokinetics of cytotoxic therapies, and the impact of treatment on outcomes.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!