Racial Disparities in the 30-Day Outcomes of Gender-affirming Chest Surgeries.

Ann Surg

Department of Plastic and Oral Surgery, Center for Gender Surgery, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA.

Published: July 2023

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to evaluate the impact of race on 30-day outcomes of gender-affirming chest surgeries, as previous research in this area was limited.
  • Data from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program was analyzed, focusing on complications post-surgery between 2005 to 2019, utilizing statistical methods to identify differences among racial groups.
  • Results indicated no overall racial differences in complication rates; however, Black patients had higher rates of mild and severe complications, along with a higher likelihood of unplanned reoperations compared to White patients, highlighting potential racial disparities in surgical outcomes.

Article Abstract

Objective: To determine if and how race impacts the 30-day outcomes of gender-affirming chest surgeries.

Background: Little is currently known about how race may affect the outcomes of gender-affirming surgeries.

Methods: We analyzed data from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database of 30-day complications of gender-affirming chest surgeries from 2005 to 2019. All participants had a postoperative diagnosis code for gender dysphoria and at least one procedure code for bilateral mastectomy, bilateral breast reduction, or bilateral augmentation mammoplasty. Differences by racial group were analyzed through Pearson χ 2 and multivariate logistic regression.

Results: There were no racial differences in the all-complication rates for both transmasculine and transfeminine individuals undergoing gender-affirming chest surgeries. Black patients undergoing masculinizing procedures were significantly more likely to experience mild systemic [adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 2.17, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.02-4.65] and severe complications (aOR: 5.63, 95% CI: 1.99-15.98) when compared with White patients. Patients of unknown race had increased odds of experiencing severe complications for masculinizing procedures compared with White patients (aOR: 3.77, 95% CI: 1.39-10.24). Transmasculine individuals whose race was unknown were 1.98 times more likely (95% CI: 1.03-3.81) to experience an unplanned reoperation compared with White individuals. Black transfeminine individuals were 10.50 times more likely to experience an unplanned reoperation (95% CI: 1.15-95.51) than their White peers.

Conclusions: Although overall complications are uncommon, there is evidence to suggest that there are racial disparities in certain 30-day outcomes of gender-affirming chest surgeries.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000005512DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

gender-affirming chest
20
outcomes gender-affirming
16
chest surgeries
16
30-day outcomes
12
compared white
12
racial disparities
8
disparities 30-day
8
transfeminine individuals
8
masculinizing procedures
8
severe complications
8

Similar Publications

Background: Although many transmasculine individuals undergo 1 or more gynecological surgeries (ie, hysterectomy, oophorectomy, tubectomy, or colpectomy), little has been published about motivation, subjective experiences, and the effect on dysphoria and quality of life.

Aim: The aim of this study was to acquire an in-depth understanding of patients' motivations and experienced outcomes of gynecological gender surgery.

Methods: In this qualitative study, in-depth semi-structured interviews were conducted.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: There are no standardized chest binding guidelines available to health care providers serving transgender and nonbinary individuals, exacerbating the significant health disparities affecting this community. Our study aimed to demonstrate the need for further evidence-based investigations into the association between chest binder type and health outcomes.

Methods: For this cross-sectional observational study, a community-engaged online survey evaluating individuals' experiences with their current or most recent chest binder was distributed to LGBTQ+ community centers, online forums, and clinics from July to November 2021.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Transgender individuals commonly feel significant distress and discomfort, termed gender dysphoria, as a result of the discrepancy between their gender assigned at birth and their gender identity. A major source of gender dysphoria stems from distinct anatomical differences between the male and female chest. Gender-affirming mastectomy of transmasculine patients and breast augmentation for chest feminization of transfeminine patients, also referred to as top surgery, are often the first surgical interventions and most commonly pursued physical modifications for the treatment of gender dysphoria among this patient population.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Defining a danger zone for iatrogenic long thoracic nerve injury in gender-affirming mastectomy.

J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg

January 2025

Oregon Health and Science University, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Portland, OR, USA; Oregon Health and Science University, Transgender Health Program, Portland, OR, USA. Electronic address:

The long thoracic nerve's (LTN) superficial location on the chest wall renders it vulnerable to iatrogenic injury. Plastic surgeons' gender-affirming mastectomy volumes are rapidly increasing. This operation involves lateral chest contouring placing the distal LTN at risk of injury along the chest wall.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!