A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@remsenmedia.com&api_key=81853a771c3a3a2c6b2553a65bc33b056f08&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Patient-centered research: how do women tolerate nipple fluid aspiration as a potential screening tool for breast cancer? | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • Nipple fluid aspiration (NFA) is a procedure that collects fluid from the nipple to help find early signs of breast cancer.
  • A study compared how uncomfortable NFA is compared to other methods like mammograms and blood draws.
  • Most women found NFA very tolerable, with 98% saying they would do it again, which suggests it could be a useful tool for detecting breast cancer early.

Article Abstract

Background: Nipple fluid aspiration (NFA) is a technique to acquire nipple aspirate fluid (NAF), which is considered a rich source of breast-specific biomarkers. Originating directly from the mammary ducts, this liquid biopsy can offer insight into the process of carcinogenesis at its earliest stage and therefore could be of added value to the current imaging-based breast cancer screening tools. With that in mind, it is necessary to know how well NFA is tolerated.

Aim: To evaluate the participants' tolerability of NFA compared to breast imaging screening methods and blood draws.

Materials And Methods: Three cohorts of women underwent NFA: healthy women (n = 190), women diagnosed with breast cancer (n = 137) and women at high risk of developing breast cancer (n = 48). A 0-10 discomfort score of NFA, mammography, breast MRI and blood draws, was filled in at the study visits, which took place once or annually.

Results: The median discomfort rate of NFA was 1, which was significantly lower than the median discomfort of mammography and breast MRI (5 and 3, respectively, p < 0.001), but significantly higher than median discomfort for blood draws (0, p < 0.001). The great majority of women would undergo the procedure again (98%) and recommend it to others (97%).

Conclusion: This study shows that NFA was well tolerated by healthy women, women diagnosed with breast cancer and high-risk women. This makes NFA a feasible method to pursue as a potential future breast cancer early detection tool, based on resident biomarkers.

Trial Registration: NL41845.041.12 , NL57343.041.16 and NL11690.041.06 in trialregister.nl.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9235076PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-022-09795-8DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

breast cancer
12
nipple fluid
8
fluid aspiration
8
mammography breast
8
breast mri
8
median discomfort
8
breast
7
nfa
6
patient-centered women
4
women tolerate
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!