A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Effects of Freezing and Rewarming Methods on RNA Quality of Blood Samples. | LitMetric

RNA extracted from human blood has been widely applied to biological, medical, and clinical research of numerous diseases. Previous studies have demonstrated that high-quality RNA is indispensable to guarantee the reliability of downstream assays. In this study, we investigated the effects of freezing procedures, rewarming methods, and blood components on RNA quality of blood samples. Rabbit blood samples were divided into two groups: (1) whole blood (WB) and (2) blood cell components (BCC) with plasma removed. Samples were frozen using four representative freezing procedures (snap freezing in liquid nitrogen, snap freezing at -80°C, traditional slow freezing, and programmable controlled rate freezing) and rewarmed by placing at 4°C or by vortexing. RNA was extracted using the phenol-chloroform RNA extraction method and measured by an Agilent bioanalyzer. Then, human blood was used to verify the best protocol obtained from the rabbit blood experiment. For the four freezing procedures, there were no differences in RNA integrity. For different rewarming methods, RNA integrity number (RIN) values of RNA extracted from frozen WB and BCC samples in the vortex group were above 9, while RNA obtained from WB showed worse quality compared with BCC in the 4°C group. For verification using human blood, RIN values of frozen human WB rewarmed by vortexing ranged from 8.0 to 9.1. Blood components and rewarming methods could affect the RNA quality of blood samples. For scenarios where WB samples have already been cryopreserved, the vortex rewarming method is optimal for high-quality RNA. Otherwise, we would recommend centrifuging fresh WB and cryopreserving it in the form of BCC, which showed a tendency to obtain high-quality RNA by either of the two rewarming methods.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/bio.2022.0007DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

rewarming methods
20
blood samples
16
rna
13
rna quality
12
blood
12
quality blood
12
rna extracted
12
human blood
12
high-quality rna
12
freezing procedures
12

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!