Automated identification and quantification of invisible microplastics in agricultural soils.

Sci Total Environ

State Key Joint Laboratory of Environmental Simulation and Pollution Control, College of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China; Marine Institute for Bioresources and Environment, Peking University Shenzhen Institute, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518057, China. Electronic address:

Published: October 2022

Microplastics in agricultural soils have become the research hotspot in recent years, however, the quantitative methods based on the traditional visual inspection may have a high false detection rate. Here we combined the laser direct infrared (LDIR) and Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) methods to investigate the microplastics in farmland with long-term agricultural activities. The results showed that the total abundance of microplastics reached 1.98 ± 0.41 × 10, 1.57 ± 0.28 × 10, 1.78 ± 0.27 × 10, and 3.20 ± 0.41 × 10 particles/kg soil in cotton fields with film mulching of 5, 10, 20, and >30 years, respectively. LDIR results indicated that microplastics ranging from 10 to 500 μm accounted for 96.5-99.9 % of the total microplastic amounts in the soils. Additionally, a total of 26 polymer types of microplastics were detected, among which polyethylene (PE), polypropylene (PP), polyvinyl chloride (PVC), polyamide (PA), and polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) were dominantly observed. For the microplastics detected by FTIR (500 μm-5 mm), PE polymer was majorly observed (88.0-98.9 %). Most microplastics were films (88.2 %), while fibers and pellets were also found. The reclaimed water from sewage treatment plants, the drip irrigation utilities, and the residual plastic film are the potential sources of microplastics in the farmland soils. By using the automated quantitative and identifiable approaches, this study suggested that the commonly used visual counting method may underestimate the microplastic contamination in agricultural soils.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.156853DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

agricultural soils
12
microplastics
9
microplastics agricultural
8
microplastics farmland
8
microplastics detected
8
soils
5
automated identification
4
identification quantification
4
quantification invisible
4
invisible microplastics
4

Similar Publications

Background: Rice is a staple food for the global population. However, extreme weather events threaten the stability of the water supply for agriculture, posing a critical challenge to the stability of the food supply. The use of technology to assess the water status of rice plants enables the precise management of agricultural water resources.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Innovation in crop establishment is crucial for wheat productivity in drought-prone climates. Seedling establishment, the first stage of crop productivity, relies heavily on root and coleoptile system architecture for effective soil water and nutrient acquisition, particularly in regions practicing deep planting. Root phenotyping methods that quickly determine coleoptile lengths are vital for breeding studies.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Nano-biochar considers a versatile and valuable sorbent to enhance plant productivity by improving soil environment and emerged as a novel solution for environmental remediation and sustainable agriculture in modern era. In this study, roles of foliar applied nanobiochar colloidal solution (NBS) on salt stressed tomato plants were investigated. For this purpose, NBS was applied (0%, 1% 3% and 5%) on two groups of plants (control 0 mM and salt stress 60 mM).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Plant growth-promoting bacteria (PGPB) are considered an effective eco-friendly biostimulator. However, relatively few studies have examined how PGPB affect the native bacterial community of major crops. Thus, this study investigates the impact of a PGPB consortium, comprising Pseudomonas sp.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Agroforestry systems are known to enhance soil health and climate resilience, but their impact on greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in rubber-based agroforestry systems across diverse configurations is not fully understood. Here, six representative rubber-based agroforestry systems (encompassing rubber trees intercropped with arboreal, shrub, and herbaceous species) were selected based on a preliminary investigation, including Hevea brasiliensis intercropping with Alpinia oxyphylla (AOM), Alpinia katsumadai (AKH), Coffea arabica (CAA), Theobroma cacao (TCA), Cinnamomum cassia (CCA), and Pandanus amaryllifolius (PAR), and a rubber monoculture as control (RM). Soil physicochemical properties, enzyme activities, and GHG emission characteristics were determined at 0-20 cm soil depth.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!