The aim of this study was to quantify the effect of radius over horizontal curve sections on driving workload (). Twenty-five participants participated in the driving simulation experiments and completed five driving scenes. The NASA-TLX scale was used to measure the mental demand, physical demand, and temporal demand in various scenes, which were applied to assess subjective workload (). Objective workload () assessment methods were divided into three types, in which the eye tracker was used to measure the blink frequency and pupil diameter, and the electrocardiograph (ECG) was used to measure the heart rate and the heart rate variability. Additionally, the simulator was used to measure the lateral position and the steering wheel angle. The results indicate that radius is negatively correlated with and , and the in a radius of 300 m is approximately twice that in a radius of 550 m. Compared with the ECG, the explanatory power of the can be increased to 0.974 by combining eye-movement, ECG, and driving performance. Moreover, the main source of the is the maneuver stage, which accounts for more than 50%. When the radius is over 550 m, the shows few differences in the maneuver stage. These findings may provide new avenues of research to harness the role of s in optimizing traffic safety.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9222676PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19127063DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

driving workload
8
horizontal curve
8
heart rate
8
radius 550
8
maneuver stage
8
driving
5
radius
5
evaluation method
4
method driving
4
workload
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!