Purpose: To study the impact of systematic MLC leaf positional uncertainties (stemming from mechanical inaccuracies or sub-optimal MLC modeling) on the quality of intracranial single-isocenter multi-target VMAT-SRS treatment plans. An estimation of appropriate tolerance levels is attempted.

Methods: Five patients, with three to four metastases and at least one target lying in close proximity to organs-at-risk (OARs) were included in this study. A single-isocenter multi-arc VMAT plan per patient was prepared, which served as the reference for dosimetric impact evaluation. A range of leaf offsets was introduced (±0.03 mm up to ±0.30 mm defined at the MLC plane) to both leaf banks, by varying the leaf offset MLC modeling parameter in Monaco for all the prepared plans, in order to simulate projected leaf offsets of ±0.09 mm up to ±0.94 mm at the isocenter plane, respectively. For all offsets simulated and cases studied, dose distributions were re-calculated and compared with the corresponding reference ones. An experimental dosimetric procedure using the SRS mapCHECK diode array was also performed to support the simulation study results and investigate its suitability to detect small systematic leaf positional errors.

Results: Projected leaf offsets of ±0.09 mm were well-tolerated with respect to both target dosimetry and OAR-sparing. A linear relationship was found between D percentage change and projected leaf offset (slope: 12%/mm). Impact of projected offset on target dosimetry was strongly associated with target volume. In two cases, plans that could be considered potentially clinically unacceptable (i.e., clinical dose constraint violation) were obtained even for projected offsets as small as 0.19 mm. The performed experimental dosimetry check can detect potential small systematic leaf errors.

Conclusions: Plan quality indices and dose-volume metrics are very sensitive to systematic sub-millimeter leaf positional inaccuracies, projected at the isocenter plane. Acceptable and tolerance levels in systematic MLC uncertainties need to be tailored to VMAT-SRS spatial and dosimetric accuracy requirements.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9359048PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13708DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

systematic mlc
12
leaf positional
12
leaf offsets
12
projected leaf
12
leaf
10
impact systematic
8
positional uncertainties
8
single-isocenter multi-target
8
multi-target vmat-srs
8
vmat-srs treatment
8

Similar Publications

Article Synopsis
  • Dynamic conformal arc therapy (DCAT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) both provide similar quality for treating brain metastases, but this study focused on how MLC errors during treatment affect dose distribution.
  • Researchers created reference plans and simulated MLC errors using a head phantom, analyzing how these errors influenced dose delivery to the targets and surrounding brain tissue.
  • The findings revealed that while MLC errors affected both techniques' dose distribution similarly, the DCAT technique showed greater resilience, with less variation in target doses compared to VMAT.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Vidarabine (VID) is an antiviral medication that is commonly utilized to treat conditions such as hand, foot, and mouth disease and herpes. Constipation is a prevalent complication of these diseases. Could VID treat these diseases by influencing defecation behavior? To date, no studies have been conducted on the potential of VID to relieve constipation.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Precise lower limb measurements are crucial for assessing musculoskeletal health; fully automated solutions have the potential to enhance standardization and reproducibility of these measurements. This study compared the measurements performed by BoneMetrics (Gleamer, Paris, France), a commercial artificial intelligence (AI)-based software, to expert manual measurements on anteroposterior full-leg standing radiographs.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on a dataset comprising consecutive anteroposterior full-leg standing radiographs obtained from four imaging institutions.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Sleep-related movement disorders in children: recent updates.

World J Pediatr

November 2024

Sleep Center, Division of Pulmonary and Sleep Medicine, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, 3333 Burnet Ave, MLC 7041, Cincinnati, OH, USA.

Article Synopsis
  • Sleep-related movement disorders (SRMDs) like restless legs syndrome (RLS) and periodic limb movement disorder (PLMD) are common in children but often go unrecognized; a new disorder called restless sleep disorder (RSD) has also been identified.
  • The causes of these disorders include genetic factors, problems with dopamine function, and iron deficiency, with RLS and RSD possibly sharing similar mechanisms.
  • Effective treatments are available, including iron therapy and specific medications, but further research is necessary to better understand RSD and improve care for affected children.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!