A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Complex Fermi-Löwdin orbital self-interaction correction. | LitMetric

This paper introduces the use of complex Fermi orbital descriptors (FODs) in the Fermi-Löwdin self-interaction-corrected density functional theory (FLOSIC). With complex FODs, the Fermi-Löwdin orbitals (FLOs) that are used to evaluate the SIC correction to the total energy become complex. Complex FLO-SIC (cFLOSIC) calculations based on the local spin density approximation produce total energies that are generally lower than the corresponding energies found with FLOSIC restricted to real orbitals (rFLOSIC). The cFLOSIC results are qualitatively similar to earlier Perdew-Zunger SIC (PZ-SIC) calculations using complex orbitals [J. Chem. Phys. 80, 1972 (1984); Phys. Rev. A 84, 050501(R) (2011); and J. Chem. Phys. 137, 124102 (2012)]. The energy lowering stems from the exchange-correlation part of the self-interaction correction. The Hartree part of the correction is more negative in rFLOSIC. The energy difference between real and complex solutions is greater for more strongly hybridized FLOs in atoms and for FLOs corresponding to double and triple bonds in molecules. The case of N is examined in detail to show the differences between the real and complex FLOs. We show that the complex triple-bond orbitals are simple, and physically appealing combinations of π and σ orbitals that have not been discussed before. Consideration of complex FODs, and resulting unitary transformations, underscores the fact that FLO centroids are not necessarily good guesses for FOD positions in a FLOSIC calculation.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/5.0091212DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

complex
10
self-interaction correction
8
fods fermi-löwdin
8
complex fods
8
chem phys
8
real complex
8
orbitals
5
complex fermi-löwdin
4
fermi-löwdin orbital
4
orbital self-interaction
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!