Background: We aimed to test the accuracy of an electronic hand hygiene monitoring system (EHHMS) during daily clinical activities in different wards and with varying health care professions.
Methods: The accuracy of an EHHMS (Sani Nudge) was assessed during real clinical conditions by comparing events registered by two observers in parallel with events registered by the EHHMS. The events were categorized as true-positive, false-positive, and false-negative registrations. Sensitivity and positive predictive value (PPV) were calculated.
Results: A total of 103 events performed by 25 health care workers (9 doctors, 11 nurses, and 5 cleaning assistants) were included in the analyses. The EHHMS had a sensitivity of 100% and a PPV of 100% when measuring alcohol-based hand rub. When looking at the hand hygiene opportunities of all health care workers combined taking place in the patient rooms and working rooms, the sensitivity was 75% and the PPV 95%. For doctors' and nurses' taking care of patients in their beds the EHHMS had a sensitivity of 100% and a PPV of 94%.
Conclusions: The objective accuracy measures demonstrate that this EHHMS can capture hand hygiene behavior under clinical conditions in different settings with clinical health care workers but show less accuracy with cleaning assistants.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2022.06.017 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!