Clinical research nurses experience unique challenges in the context of their role that can lead to conflict and moral distress. Although examined in many areas, moral distress has not been studied in clinical research nurses. The aim of this study was to examine moral distress in clinical research nurses and the relationship between moral distress scores and demographic characteristics of clinical research nurses. This was a descriptive quantitative study to measure moral distress in clinical research nurses using the Measure of Moral Distress - Healthcare Professionals (MMD-HP) administered electronically. Demographic data were also collected. Registered nurses working in the clinical research nurse role ( = 322) were recruited through use of social media, emails, digital flyers, and snowball recruitment. Data was analyzed using SPSS. Pearson's correlation, independent t-test, and one-way ANOVA were performed to explore differences among the demographic variables. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board at Texas Woman's University. A consent statement was included, and completion of the questionnaire was construed as consent. Analysis revealed a mean overall moral distress score of 79.58 (SD = 64.27) and median of 67, with a range of 0-354. Moral distress scores were negatively correlated with clinical research nurse age ( = 0-.156, < 0.05). Reliability of the MMD-HP was demonstrated with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.93. The findings demonstrate that clinical research nurses do experience moral distress and revealed a wide range of scores. Further research is necessary to determine potential patient impact due to moral distress and to develop processes to minimize moral distress in the clinical research setting. This study was conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic, and the digital recruitment methods proved effective in recruiting a wide range of clinical research nurses, both nationally and internationally.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/09697330221090613 | DOI Listing |
Risk Manag Healthc Policy
January 2025
Graduate Institute of Biomedical Informatics, College of Medical Science and Technology, Taipei Medical University, New Taipei City, 235603, Taiwan.
Purpose: As HF progresses into advanced HF, patients experience a poor quality of life, distressing symptoms, intensive care use, social distress, and eventual hospital death. We aimed to investigate the relationship between morality and potential prognostic factors among in-patient and emergency patients with HF.
Patients And Methods: A case series study: Data are collected from in-hospital and emergency care patients from 2014 to 2021, including their international classification of disease at admission, and laboratory data such as blood count, liver and renal functions, lipid profile, and other biochemistry from the hospital's electrical medical records.
Vet J
January 2025
Faculty of Data Science, Musashino University, 3-3-3 Ariake Koto-ku, Tokyo 135-8181, Japan. Electronic address:
The veterinary profession faces a critical challenge: burnout. Long hours, emotional strain, financial pressures, and difficult client interactions contribute to stress and drive veterinary professionals from the field. This harms not only their well-being but also patient care and workplace morale.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFNurs Ethics
January 2025
Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná (PUCPR).
This article presents a scoping review aimed at mapping the main sources of moral distress among nursing professionals. The review was conducted according to the Arksey and O'Malley methodology, using the SPIDER framework to guide the systematic search in the BVS, PubMed, PsycArticles, Scielo, and Scopus databases. Initially, 2320 publications were identified.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPhilos Ethics Humanit Med
January 2025
Department of Allergy, Immunology and Respiratory Medicine, Central Clinical School, The Alfred Hospital, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Background: Moral distress is reported to be a critical force contributing to intensifying rates of anxiety, depression and burnout experienced by healthcare workers. In this paper, we examine the moral dilemmas and ensuing distress personally and collectively experienced by healthcare workers while caring for patients during the pandemic.
Methods: Data are drawn from free-text responses from a cross-sectional national online survey of Australian healthcare workers about the patient care challenges they faced.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!