Aims: Cardiogenic shock (CS) with variable systemic inflammation may be responsible for patient heterogeneity and the exceedingly high mortality rate. Cardiovascular events have been associated with clonal haematopoiesis (CH) where specific gene mutations in haematopoietic stem cells lead to clonal expansion and the development of inflammation. This study aims to assess the prevalence of CH and its association with survival in a population of CS patients in a quaternary centre.

Methods And Results: We compared the frequency of CH mutations among 341 CS patients and 345 ambulatory heart failure (HF) patients matched for age, sex, ejection fraction, and HF aetiology. The association of CH with survival and levels of circulating inflammatory cytokines was analysed. We detected 266 CH mutations in 149 of 686 (22%) patients. CS patients had a higher prevalence of CH-related mutations than HF patients (odds ratio 1.5; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.0-2.1, p = 0.02) and was associated with decreased survival (30 days: hazard ratio [HR] 2.7; 95% CI 1.3-5.7, p = 0.006; 90 days: HR 2.2; 95% CI 1.3-3.9, p = 0.003; and 3 years: HR 1.7; 95% CI 1.1-2.8, p = 0.01). TET2 or ASXL1 mutations were associated with lower survival in CS patients at all time-points (p ≤ 0.03). CS patients with TET2 mutations had higher circulating levels of SCD40L, interferon-γ, interleukin-4, and tumour necrosis factor-α (p ≤ 0.04), while those with ASXL1 mutations had decreased levels of CCL7 (p = 0.03).

Conclusions: Cardiogenic shock patients have high frequency of CH, notably mutations in TET2 and ASXL1. This was associated with reduced survival and dysregulation of circulating inflammatory cytokines in those CS patients with CH.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejhf.2588DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

cardiogenic shock
12
patients
11
clonal haematopoiesis
8
mutations
8
association survival
8
circulating inflammatory
8
inflammatory cytokines
8
tet2 asxl1
8
asxl1 mutations
8
associated
5

Similar Publications

Purpose Of Review: This article discusses a tailored approach to managing cardiogenic shock and temporary mechanical circulatory support (tMCS). We also outline specific mobilization strategies for patients with different tMCS devices and configurations, which can be enabled by this tailored approach to cardiogenic shock management.

Recent Findings: Safe and effective mobilization of patients with cardiogenic shock receiving tMCS can be accomplished.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Cardiogenic shock represents a critical condition in which the heart is unable to maintain adequate circulation leading to insufficient tissue perfusion and end-organ failure. Temporary mechanical circulatory support offers the potential to stabilize patients, provide a bridge-to-recovery, provide a bridge-to-decision, or facilitate definitive heart replacement therapies. Although randomized controlled trials have been performed in infarct-related cardiogenic shock and refractory cardiac arrest, the optimal timing, appropriate patient selection, and optimal implementation of these devices remain complex and predominantly based on observational data and expert consensus, especially in non-ischaemic shock.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The use of mechanical circulatory support devices for high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has increased over the past decade despite limited data of benefit. We sought to examine the association between intravascular microaxial left ventricular assist device (LVAD) versus intra-aortic balloon pump use in patients without cardiogenic shock (CS) undergoing PCI.

Methods And Results: This retrospective study analyzed claims data from a large, insured population who underwent PCI without CS from April 1, 2016 to July 31, 2022.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The mortality rate of postcardiotomy cardiogenic shock after cardiovascular surgery is quite high, and the only way to avoid this serious complication is to initiate a preemptive strategy during surgery. The Impella 5.5 device with the SmartAssist system (Abiomed) is mainly used to prevent or to treat cardiogenic shock in cardiac surgery, but it is not often used in aortic surgery.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Direct mechanical ventricular actuation (DMVA) with the Anstadt cup is effective for non-blood-contacting biventricular support. Pneumatic regulation of a silicone device augments ventricular pump function. Vacuum attachment facilitates diastolic augmentation critical for biventricular support.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!