Diagnosing people living with chronic viral hepatitis is challenging due to the absence of symptoms as long as liver decompensated cirrhosis come out. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the prevalence of HBV and/or HCV infections in a non-selected population, hospitalised for SARS-CoV-2 infection in a tertiary care hospital in Northern Italy. During the study period 1,429 patients were admitted to hospital for SARS-CoV-2 infection, serologic tests for HBV and/or HCV were available for 382 (27%) patients and 3 were excluded due to their previous known serologic status. Among 379 patients, 235 (62%) were male, median age was 70 years (range 21-103), 360 (95%) were Caucasian. Among them, 372/379 (98%) were screened for HBsAg, 320/379 (84%) for HBcAb. HBsAg was positive in 2/372 (0.5%, 95% CI 0.0006-0.02) patients (only in one HBV-DNA was performed that was negative), while HBcAb was found positive in 55/320 (17%, 95% CI 0.13-0.22). Among 370/379 (98%) patients screened for HCV, 11/370 (3%, 95% CI 0.02-0.05) had positive HCV-Ab. Five out of 11 (45%) were tested for HCV-RNA that resulted positive in two patients (0.5%, 95% CI 0.0006-0.02). Considering this data, even though the screening was performed in only 27% of study population, a tailored screening in people with known risk factors for hepatitis might be preferable to universal screening in low prevalence areas. Also a prompt diagnostic workout should begin in case of clinical or laboratory suspicion of hepatitis and in those starting immunosuppressive treatments.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9211782PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10900-022-01111-6DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

viral hepatitis
8
hospitalised sars-cov-2
8
hbv and/or
8
and/or hcv
8
sars-cov-2 infection
8
05% 95%
8
95% 00006-002
8
patients
7
95%
5
prevalence viral
4

Similar Publications

Article Synopsis
  • The report updates the 1999 CDC Framework for Program Evaluation in Public Health to include new advancements and lessons learned in evaluation and public health.
  • The 2024 framework introduces a nonprescriptive tool with six steps for effective evaluation planning and implementation, while emphasizing engagement, equity, and learning from insights.
  • It serves as a guide for designing evaluations applicable to various programs, enhancing evidence-based decision-making, and improving program outcomes across different areas.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!