A contributing risk factor and a byproduct of a hamstrings strain is limited hamstrings range of motion (ROM). Some evidence supports static stretching (SS) and lumbar spinal mobilization therapy (LSMT) as an effective means for increasing hamstrings ROM. However, the efficacy of combining LSMT and SS for increasing hamstrings ROM is unknown. The objective of the study is to quantify the immediate effects of the combination of LSMT and SS compared to LSMT and SS on hamstrings ROM in a healthy population. Thirty participants were randomized by block allocation into one of three intervention groups: (1) LSMT (unilateral lumbar PA mobilization at L-4); (2) SS; or (3) combination of LSMT and SS. Hamstrings ROM was measured pre- and post-intervention by the active knee extension test (AKET). There was no group-by-time interaction effect (p = 0.871). Within group analysis revealed a significant statistical change and a large effect size: LSMT (p = .037, RCI = 3.36, = 0.771); SS (p = 0.035, RCI = 2.94, = 0.781); combination (p = .005, RCI = 4.21, d = 1.186. The findings suggest that the combination of LSMT and SS does not have a further effect on hamstrings ROM compared to the individual results of LSMT or SS.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9157527PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.52082/jssm.2022.253DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

hamstrings rom
20
combination lsmt
12
lsmt hamstrings
12
lsmt
9
lumbar mobilization
8
static stretching
8
hamstrings
8
hamstrings range
8
range motion
8
increasing hamstrings
8

Similar Publications

: Increasing exercise intensity and performance output with superimposed vibration gains interest, especially in high-performance training. However, the additional benefit of vibration in passive stretching exercises and its mechanisms remain unclarified. : Passive stretching with (ST+V) and without (ST) vibration (20 Hz) was performed in male Olympic youth skiing athletes ( = 8, age: 17.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Risk Factors for Low Back Pain in Youth Inline Hockey Players During the Season-A Prospective Cohort Research.

Children (Basel)

December 2024

Department of Physical Activity and Sport, Faculty of Sport Sciences, CEIR Campus Mare Nostrum (CMN), University of Murcia, 30720 Murcia, Spain.

Background: Low back pain is one of the most common musculoskeletal complaints in team sports. A screening test can help understand why injuries occur and predict who is at risk for non-contact low back pain. The objectives of the research were (1) to create models using logistic regression analysis of limited lower-extremity ranges of motion to prospectively identify potential factors for in-season non-contact non-contact low back pain and (2) to determine a training threshold (cut-off) for the identified factors in inline hockey players.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Current protocols for delivering percussive therapy (PT) using massage guns are heterogeneous creating a need to establish the impact of study design on physiological measures. This cross-over design study aimed to determine the most effective protocol, among the eight protocols examined, on lower body flexibility, and to support the provision of protocol validation for future research.

Method: Recreationally active healthy adults (n = 35) undertook two main protocols; three sessions per week at 2100 rpm or increasing the speed from session-to-session: 1750 to 2100-2400 rpm.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • The study aimed to investigate hip range of motion (ROM) and hamstring flexibility in individuals with chronic nonspecific low back pain (CNLBP) compared to healthy controls, revealing potential issues with hip joint mobility.
  • Results showed that those with CNLBP had significant decreases in hip adduction and internal rotation, while displaying increased hip flexion, extension, abduction, and external rotation, suggesting they exhibit a hip capsular pattern.
  • However, there was no significant difference in hamstring flexibility between the CNLBP group and the control group, indicating that hamstring tightness is not associated with CNLBP.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!