AI Article Synopsis

  • A clinical study compared the effectiveness and safety of a fixed-dose combination nasal spray (Fluticasone Furoate and Oxymetazoline) to Fluticasone alone for treating allergic rhinitis in adults with moderate-to-severe congestion.
  • Results showed that the combination spray significantly reduced nasal symptoms more than Fluticasone alone, with patients experiencing greater relief from congestion and better overall symptom scores throughout the treatment period.
  • Both treatments were well tolerated by patients, and the combination spray did not lead to rebound congestion after 28 days of use, indicating its safety for long-term application.

Article Abstract

Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of a fixed dose combination of Fluticasone Furoate and Oxymetazoline Hydrochloride Nasal Spray 27.5/50 mcg (FDC) with Fluticasone Furoate Nasal Spray 27.5 mcg (Fluticasone) in the management of allergic rhinitis.

Patients And Methods: A prospective, randomized, double-blind, two-arm, active-controlled, parallel, multicenter, comparative clinical study was conducted in patients with allergic rhinitis aged 18 years and above having moderate-to-severe nasal congestion.

Results: A total of 250 patients were randomized (1:1) to receive either the FDC or Fluticasone alone in a dose of two sprays in each nostril once daily at night. There was a significantly (<0.001) greater reduction in night-time Total Nasal Symptom Score with the FDC as compared to Fluticasone at all the time points starting from as early as day 3 and sustained till the end of treatment (Day 28) (Day 3: -3.1 vs -2.2; Day 7: -4.0 vs -3.4; Day 14: -5.7 vs -5.0; Day 28: -7.0 vs -6.4). A significantly greater number of patients (<0.05) had complete relief in Nasal Congestion with the FDC (44.7%) as compared to Fluticasone (26.8%). Both the study medications were well tolerated by all the patients. The proportion of patients showing worsening of symptoms (rebound congestion/rhinitis medicamentosa) after stoppage of medication was similar in both groups (>0.05).

Conclusion: The FDC was superior to Fluticasone alone in relieving the nasal congestion and reduction of Total Nasal Symptom Score in allergic rhinitis patients with moderate-to-severe nasal congestion when administered once daily in the evening. Oxymetazoline when used along with the nasal steroid in a once daily dose does not cause rebound congestion and rhinitis medicamentosa even after long-term continuous use of 28 days.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9196668PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JAA.S357288DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

fluticasone furoate
12
nasal spray
12
efficacy safety
8
furoate oxymetazoline
8
fixed dose
8
dose combination
8
management allergic
8
allergic rhinitis
8
fdc fluticasone
8
fluticasone
5

Similar Publications

Introduction: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is associated with exacerbations which can reduce quality of life and increase mortality. Single-inhaler triple therapy (SITT) is recommended for maintenance treatment of COPD among patients experiencing exacerbations despite dual-therapy use. This real-world comparative effectiveness study compared the impact of SITTs, fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol (FF/UMEC/VI), and budesonide/glycopyrrolate/formoterol fumarate (BUD/GLY/FORM), on COPD exacerbations and mortality.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: The clinical benefits of fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol (FF/UMEC/VI) have been demonstrated in clinical trials. There is limited evidence regarding the effectiveness and economic outcomes associated with FF/UMEC/VI use in US clinical practice. This real-world study assessed asthma-related exacerbations, healthcare resource utilization (HRU), and healthcare costs among a Medicare Advantage-insured population before and after initiation of FF/UMEC/VI in patients with asthma previously treated with an inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting β-agonist (ICS/LABA).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: UMEC/VI administered via a combination inhaler is associated with a clinically significant improvement in lung function and health-related quality of life in patients with mild-to-moderate COPD. However, their efficacy compared to other bronchodilator mono or dual therapies still remains unclear.

Objective: The objective of this research was to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of UMEC/VI dual and UMEC/VI/FF triple therapies versus alternative bronchodilator regimens in COPD patients.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • This study examines how well patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) stick to their medication regimens, comparing a single daily inhaler (FF/UMEC/VI) to a combination that requires two inhalations twice a day (BUD/GLY/FOR).
  • Using insurance claims data from 2019 to 2023, researchers evaluated adherence (how often patients take their medication) and persistence (how long they continue treatment), with a total of 11,597 COPD patients involved.
  • Results showed that patients using the single inhaler (FF/UMEC/VI) had better adherence and persistence over 6 and 12 months compared to those using the combination
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives: To evaluate and compare medication adherence and persistence for patients newly initiating single-inhaler triple therapy (SITT) and multiple-inhaler triple therapy (MITT) for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in Japan.

Design: Retrospective, new-user, active comparator, observational cohort study using inverse probability of treatment weighting.

Setting: Health insurance claims data from the Medical Data Vision Co.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!