AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to assess the safety and effectiveness of preoperative levosimendan in patients receiving left ventricular assist devices (LVADs), focusing on outcomes like right ventricular failure (RVF) and in-hospital mortality.
  • The analysis included 62 patients, dividing them into two groups: those treated with levosimendan and those who were not, finding similar rates and times for RVF, inotropic support, and length of hospital stays between both groups.
  • The research concluded that while levosimendan was safe to use before LVAD implantation, it did not significantly improve post-operative outcomes compared to the control group.

Article Abstract

Objective: Investigate the safety and efficacy of preoperative levosimendan in patients undergoing left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation.

Methods: Consecutive patients who received LVADs (HeartMate-2, 3, HVAD) in a single tertiary medical center (2012-2018). INTERMACS profile 1 patients were excluded. The primary outcome was post-LVAD right ventricular failure (RVF) and inhospital mortality rates. The secondary outcomes included other clinical, echocardiographic and hemodynamic parameters at follow-up.

Results: Final cohort consisted of 62 patients (40[65%] in the levosimendan group and 22[35%] in the no-levosimendan group). Post-operative RVF rate and inotrope or ventilation support time were similar in the levosimendan and no-levosimendan groups (7.5% vs. 13.6%; P = 0.43, median of 51 vs. 72 h; P = 0.41 and 24 vs. 27 h; P = 0.19, respectively). Length of hospitalization, both total and in the intensive care unit, was not statistically significant (median days of 13 vs. 16; P = 0.34, and 3 vs. 4; P = 0.44, respectively). Post-operative laboratory and echocardiographic parameters and in-hospital complication rate did not differ between the groups, despite worse baseline clinical parameters in the Levosimendan group. There was no significant difference in the in-hospital and long term mortality rate (2.5% vs. 4.5%; P > 0.999 and 10% vs. 27.3% respectively; P = 0.64).

Conclusions: Levosimendan infusion prior to LVAD implantation was safe and associated with comparable results without significant improved post-operative outcomes, including RVF.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9205013PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13019-022-01915-6DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

levosimendan infusion
8
infusion prior
8
left ventricular
8
ventricular assist
8
assist device
8
ventricular failure
8
levosimendan group
8
levosimendan
6
prior left
4
ventricular
4

Similar Publications

Purpose: The management of acute heart failure (AHF) is crucial and challenging. Regarding the use of inotropes, correct patient selection and time of administration are of the essence. We hypothesize that the early use of Levosimendan favouring hemodynamic stabilization and enables rapid optimization of guideline-directed medical treatment (GDMT) in patients with HF, eventually impacting the patient's prognosis during the vulnerable phase.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: To test the hypothesis that levosimendan administration in patients with low cardiac output syndrome after cardiac surgery is associated with improved long-term (5-year follow-up) outcomes.

Design: Single-center subanalysis of the multicenter randomized CHEETAH trial.

Setting: Cardiac surgery department of a tertiary hospital.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • Primary angioplasty is the standard treatment for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), but it can cause additional cell damage, which levosimendan may help prevent.
  • In a study, patients received either levosimendan or a placebo after angioplasty, and their heart damage was assessed over 6 months.
  • Results showed that those treated with levosimendan had a significant reduction in infarct size compared to the placebo group, confirming its safety and effectiveness in this context.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Discovering the most impactful treatments for aluminum phosphide cardiotoxicity gleaned from systematic review of animal studies.

Hum Exp Toxicol

October 2024

Department of Toxicology and Pharmacology, Faculty of Pharmacy, and Pharmaceutical Sciences Research Center (PSRC), Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Article Synopsis
  • Aluminum phosphide (AlP) is a dangerous chemical that can cause death by harming heart cells, and there aren't any approved medicines to treat it yet.
  • Researchers are looking into different ways to lessen the harmful effects of AlP poisoning, including improving heart function and using various compounds.
  • Some treatments like fresh red blood cell transfusion and certain medicines show promise in helping patients, but more research is needed to confirm the best ways to treat AlP poisoning.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!