A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 143

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 143
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 209
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 994
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3134
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 574
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 488
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Optimizing data-independent acquisition (DIA) spectral library workflows for plasma proteomics studies. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • Traditional data-independent acquisition (DIA) workflows typically rely on off-column fractionation with data-dependent acquisition (DDA) to build spectral libraries for data analysis, but newer library-independent methods have been created for DIA.
  • A new gas-phase fractionation (GPF) workflow was established for generating DIA libraries, and its performance was compared with three other workflows on plasma samples from lung cancer patients, aiming to enhance protein identification and reduce experimental time.
  • The GPF workflow was more effective than the traditional DDA method in identifying proteins, while a library-independent approach based on predicted spectra identified the most proteins, highlighting that the choice of DIA library workflow can influence protein identification and overall experiment duration, though its impact on results may be minimal

Article Abstract

Traditional data-independent acquisition (DIA) workflows employ off-column fractionation with data-dependent acquisition (DDA) to generate spectral libraries for data extraction. Recent advances have led to the establishment of library-independent approaches for DIA analyses. The selection of a DIA workflow may affect the outcome of plasma proteomics studies. Here, we establish a gas-phase fractionation (GPF) workflow to create DIA libraries for DIA with parallel accumulation and serial fragmentation (diaPASEF). This workflow along with three other workflows, fractionated DDA libraries, fractionated DIA libraries, and predicted spectra libraries, were evaluated on 20 plasma samples from nonsmall cell lung cancer patients with low or high levels of IL-6. We sought to optimize protein identification and total experiment time. The novel GPF workflow for diaPASEF outperformed the traditional ddaPASEF workflow in the number of identified and quantified proteins. A library-independent workflow based on predicted spectra identified and quantified the most proteins in our experiment at the cost of computational power. Overall, the choice of DIA library workflow seemed to have a limited effect on the overall outcome of a plasma proteomics experiment, but it can affect the number of proteins identified and the total experiment time.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pmic.202200125DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

plasma proteomics
12
data-independent acquisition
8
dia
8
acquisition dia
8
proteomics studies
8
outcome plasma
8
gpf workflow
8
dia libraries
8
predicted spectra
8
total experiment
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!