AI Article Synopsis

  • Endoscopic fragment biopsy (EFB) diagnoses often do not ensure that higher-grade neoplasms are absent in colorectal lesions, with 12.4% of cases showing discrepancies in upgrade results when compared to endoscopic resection specimens.
  • The study analyzed 918 colorectal low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia (LGIN) cases, identifying key predictors for histopathological upgrades, such as NSAID use, lesion size, and specific macroscopic features.
  • The findings suggest that improving EFB practices and imaging techniques may help reduce the chances of overlooking more severe pathology.

Article Abstract

Background: It was gradually accepted that endoscopic fragment biopsy (EFB) diagnosis cannot accurately guarantee the absence of higher-grade neoplasms within the lesion of the digestive tract. There are no well-established predictors for histopathologically upgrade discrepancies between EFB diagnosing colorectal low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia (LGIN) and endoscopic resection (ER) specimens.

Methods: A total of 918 colorectal LGINs was histopathologically diagnosed by EFB, including 162 cases with upgrade discrepancy and 756 concordant cases. We compared clinicopathological data of EFB and ER specimens between these two groups. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify predictors for this upgrade histopathology.

Results: The predominant upgrade discrepancy of LGINs diagnosed by EFB was upgrades to high-grade dysplasia (114/918, 12.4%), followed by upgrades to intramucosal carcinoma (33/918, 3.6%), submucosal adenocarcinoma (10/918, 1.1%), and advanced adenocarcinoma (5/918, 0.5%). NSAID history (OR 4.83; 95% CI, 2.27-10.27; < 0.001), insufficient EFB number (OR 2.99; 95% CI, 1.91-4.68; < 0.001), maximum diameter ≥ 1.0 cm (OR 6.18; 95% CI, 1.32-28.99; = 0.021), lobulated shape (OR 2.68; 95% CI, 1.65-4.36; < 0.001), erythema (OR 2.42; 95% CI, 1.50-3.91; < 0.001), erosion (OR 7.12; 95% CI, 3.91-12.94; < 0.001), surface unevenness (OR 2.31; 95% CI, 1.33-4.01; = 0.003), and distal location of the target adenoma (OR 3.29; 95% CI, 1.68-6.41; < 0.001) were associated with the histologically upgrade discrepancies.

Conclusion: NSAID history, insufficient EFB number, adenoma size and location, and abnormal macroscopic patterns are potential predictors for upgrade histopathology of LGINs diagnosed by EFBs. The standardization of EFB number and advanced imaging techniques could minimize the risk of neglecting the potential of this upgrade histopathology.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9192244PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/1915458DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

efb number
12
upgrade
8
histopathologically upgrade
8
upgrade discrepancies
8
colorectal low-grade
8
low-grade intraepithelial
8
intraepithelial neoplasia
8
endoscopic resection
8
efb
8
diagnosed efb
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!