Background: With advances in technology and medical treatment, laparoscopy is increasingly used in hepatic cyst surgery. We hope that the analysis the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic hepatectomy versus open hepatectomy in giant hepatic cyst surgery will provide a theoretical basis for the choice of treatment means for clinicians.
Methods: By searching CNKI (China National Knowledge Infrastructure), Wanfang, VIP (China Science and Technology Journal Database), CBM (China Biology Medicine disc), PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library databases, all Chinese- and English-language articles on the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic hepatectomy and open hepatectomy for hepatic cysts were collected from database establishment to December 2021. Endnote X9 software was used for data checking and screening. Stata 15.1 software was used to analyze the relevant data. Sensitivity analysis was used to assess heterogeneity and funnel plots were used to detect bias in the results.
Results: A total of 43 relevant studies covering 3,375 patients with hepatic cysts were included: 1,733 patients in the laparoscopic hepatectomy group and 1,642 in the open hepatectomy group. Meta-analysis showed that the laparoscopic hepatectomy group had shorter operation time [standard mean difference (SMD) =-2.27, 95% confidence interval (CI): -2.63 to -1.92, P<0.001], less intraoperative blood loss (SMD =-3.62, 95% CI: -4.22 to -3.02, P<0.001), shorter hospital stay (SMD =-2.09, 95% CI: -2.41 to -1.78, P<0.001), faster postoperative gastrointestinal function recovery (SMD =-3.94, 95% CI: -4.68 to -3.20, P<0.001), and less postoperative complications [odds ratio (OR) =0.45, 95% CI: 0.35 to 0.58, P<0.001] than the open hepatectomy group, with significant statistical differences. Sensitivity analyses were largely centered, and it indicates that the results have a high stability. The funnel plot was left-right symmetrical. It indicates that the intervention group was better than the control group and the results were reliable.
Discussion: There are significant differences in the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic hepatectomy compared with open hepatectomy. Laparoscopic hepatectomy can be selected to reduce postoperative pain. There were few foreign studies included, so whether our results apply to European and American populations still needs further study.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9189254 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tcr-22-910 | DOI Listing |
Surg Endosc
January 2025
SC Chirurgia Generale e Oncologica, Ospedale Mauriziano, Torino, Italia.
Background: Concerns have been expressed about the feasibility of laparoscopic right hepatectomy (Lap-RH) after portal vein occlusion (PVO), because of its technical difficulty. The aim of this study is to assess the safety and feasibility of lap-RH after PVO.
Methods: Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from high-volume HPB centers was performed.
Transplant Proc
January 2025
Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary & Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore; SingHealth Duke-NUS Transplant Centre, Singapore; Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.
Background: Accurately assessing graft volume is crucial for donor and recipient safety in living donor liver transplantation. This can be performed using manual computed tomography volumetry (CTvol) or semiautomated methods (MeVis). We aimed to compare CTvol and MeVis in estimating the actual graft weight during LDLT, and analyse any differences in weight between laparoscopic and open donor hepatectomy.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAnn Surg
January 2025
Division of Liver Transplantation and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Objective: This study aimed to compare morbidity of living donors and recipients after pure laparoscopic donor right hepatectomy (PLDRH) and open donor right hepatectomy (ODRH).
Background: Donor and recipient morbidity have not been sufficiently reported in large-scale comparisons of PLDRH and ODRH.
Methods: This retrospective study reviewed 3348 donors who underwent PLDRH (n=329) and ODRH (n=3019) and their corresponding recipients (n=3348) between January 2014 and August 2023.
Eur J Surg Oncol
January 2025
Department of Comprehensive Surgery, Vascular Surgery, Nantong First People's Hospital, Affiliated Hospital 2 of Nantong University, 666 Shengli Road, Chongchuan District, Nantong City, Jiangsu Province, 226014, China. Electronic address:
BMC Surg
January 2025
Department of Anaesthesiology, Central People's Hospital of Zhanjiang, Zhanjiang, Guangdong, China.
Objective: The objective of this study was to develop and validate a clinically applicable nomogram for predicting the risk of delirium following hepatectomy.
Methods: We applied the LASSO regression model to identify the independent risk factors associated with POD. Subsequently, we utilized R software to develop and validate a nomogram model capable of accurately predicting the incidence of POD.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!