Diagnosing Prescription Opioid Use Disorder in Patients Using Prescribed Opioids for Chronic Pain.

Am J Psychiatry

Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University Medical Center (Hasin, Shmulewitz, Aharonovich, Scodes, Wall) and New York State Psychiatric Institute (Hasin, Shmulewitz, Stohl, Greenstein, Aharonovich, Scodes, Wall), New York; Epidemiology, Pfizer, Inc., New York (Petronis); Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle (Von Korff); Department of Anesthesiology, Rutgers University, Newark, N.J. (Datta); Department of Anesthesiology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York (Sonty, Weinberger); Department of Psychiatry, New York University, New York (Ross); Cornell University Medical College, New York (Inturrisi).

Published: October 2022

Objective: The diagnostic criteria for opioid use disorder, originally developed for heroin, did not anticipate the surge in prescription opioid use and the resulting complexities in diagnosing prescription opioid use disorder (POUD), including differentiation of pain relief (therapeutic intent) from more common drug use motives, such as to get high or to cope with negative affect. The authors examined the validity of the Psychiatric Research Interview for Substance and Mental Disorders, DSM-5 opioid version, an instrument designed to make this differentiation.

Methods: Patients (N=606) from pain clinics and inpatient substance treatment who ever received a ≥30-day opioid prescription for chronic pain were evaluated for DSM-5 POUD (i.e., withdrawal and tolerance were not considered positive if patients used opioids only as prescribed, per DSM-5 guidelines) and pain-adjusted POUD (behavioral/subjective criteria were not considered positive if pain relief [therapeutic intent] was the sole motive). Bivariate correlated-outcome regression models indicated associations of 10 validators with DSM-5 and pain-adjusted POUD measures, using mean ratios for dimensional measures and odds ratios for binary measures.

Results: The prevalences of DSM-5 and pain-adjusted POUD, respectively, were 44.4% and 30.4% at the ≥2-criteria threshold and 29.5% and 25.3% at the ≥4-criteria threshold. Pain adjustment had little effect on prevalence among substance treatment patients but resulted in substantially lower prevalence among pain treatment patients. All validators had significantly stronger associations with pain-adjusted than with DSM-5 dimensional POUD measures (ratios of mean ratios, 1.22-2.31). For most validators, pain-adjusted binary POUD had larger odds ratios than DSM-5 measures.

Conclusions: Adapting POUD measures for pain relief (therapeutic intent) improved validity. Studies should investigate the clinical utility of differentiating between therapeutic and nontherapeutic intent in evaluating POUD diagnostic criteria.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.21070721DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

prescription opioid
12
opioid disorder
12
pain relief
12
pain-adjusted poud
12
poud measures
12
poud
9
diagnosing prescription
8
pain
8
chronic pain
8
diagnostic criteria
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!