Objectives: To assess whether the combination of biparametric magnetic resonance imaging with prostate-specific antigen density can properly stratify the risk of significant prostate cancer in patients undergoing prostate biopsies and how this approach affects the detection of prostate cancer during follow-up in patients who do not undergo prostate biopsy.
Methods: In total, 411 biopsy-naïve patients who had elevated prostate-specific antigen levels and then underwent biparametric magnetic resonance imaging for suspicious prostate cancer were analyzed: 203 patients underwent prostate biopsies, whereas 208 patients did not. Significant prostate cancer detection rates stratified by the combination of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System score and prostate-specific antigen density were assessed in patients who underwent prostate biopsies. The cumulative incidence of prostate cancer detection during the follow-up was assessed in patients who omitted biopsy.
Results: The negative predictive value for significant prostate cancer was 89% for Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System scores 1-3, which increased to 97% when prostate-specific antigen density <0.15 ng/ml/cm was combined. Among patients who did not undergo biopsy, patients with Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System scores 1-3 plus prostate-specific antigen density <0.15 ng/ml/cm included significantly less cases in which significant prostate cancer was detected during the follow-up, compared with the others (3.2% versus 17% at 36 months).
Conclusions: Restriction of prostate biopsies to patients with Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System scores 4-5 or prostate-specific antigen density ≥0.15 ng/ml/cm proved to be the good biopsy strategy, effectively balancing risks and benefits.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iju.14948 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!